Free Notice (Other) - District Court of California - California


File Size: 9.7 kB
Pages: 1
Date: June 16, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 259 Words, 1,729 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/265785/7-1.pdf

Download Notice (Other) - District Court of California ( 9.7 kB)


Preview Notice (Other) - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00481-J-LSP

Document 7

Filed 06/16/2008

Page 1 of 1

1 2 3 4 5 6

KAREN P. HEWITT United States Attorney RAVEN M. NORRIS Assistant U.S. Attorney California State Bar No. 232868 United States Attorney's Office 880 Front Street, Room 6293 San Diego, California 92101-8893 Telephone: (619) 557-7157 Facsimile: (619) 557-5004 Attorneys for the Respondents

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s Raven M. Norris RAVEN M. NORRIS Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Respondents Email: [email protected] Dated: June 16, 2008 Respectfully submitted, KAREN P. HEWITT United States Attorney UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of the) Department of Homeland Security, et al.,) ) Respondents. ) ___________________________________ ) RODOLFO HERRERA-MENA, Case No.08cv0481-J (LSP)

NOTICE OF REMOVAL

Petitioner, an alien under a final order of removal, has filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus seeking release from the Department of Homeland Security custody pending a petition for review of his Final Removal order at the Ninth Circuit. Petitioner contends that his removal is not likely in the reasonably foreseeable future given his pending petition before the Ninth Circuit. However, the Ninth Circuit denied Petitioner's request for stay of removal, and Petitioner has been repatriated to his home country, Mexico. See Exhibit A, Declaration of Raven M. Norris; Exhibit B, Custody Summary Sheet; Exhibit C, Ninth Circuit General Docket. Because removal has been effected and Petitioner is no longer in Respondents' custody, the Petition currently before this Court should be dismissed as moot.