Free Verdict Sheet - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-01258-SLR

Document 297

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

MCKESSON INFORMATION SOLUTIONS LLC, Plaintiff, v. THE TRIZETTO GROUP, INC., Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Civil Action No. 04-1258-SLR

PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED SPECIAL VERDICT FORM

Thomas J. Allingham II (#0476) Michael A. Barlow (#3928) SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP One Rodney Square P.O. Box 636 Wilmington, Delaware 19899 (302) 651-3000 Attorneys for Plaintiff McKesson Information Solutions LLC

OF COUNSEL: Jeffrey G. Randall David W. Hansen SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 525 University Avenue, Suite 1100 Palo Alto, California 94301 (650) 470-4500

Case 1:04-cv-01258-SLR

Document 297

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 2 of 9

We, the jury, unanimously find as follows:

INFRINGEMENT 1. For each product listed below, has McKesson proven, by a preponderance

of the evidence, that TriZetto has directly infringed any asserted claim of U.S. Patent No. 5,253,164 (`164 Patent)? "Yes" is a finding for McKesson. "No" is a finding for TriZetto. Facets (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (O) Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 6 Claim 8 Claim 9 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 15 Claim 16 Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____

ClaimFacts (A) (B) (C) Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ No _____ No _____ No _____

1

Case 1:04-cv-01258-SLR

Document 297

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 3 of 9

(D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (O)

Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 6 Claim 8 Claim 9 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 15 Claim 16

Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____

No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____

QicLink (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (O) Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 6 Claim 8 Claim 9 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 15 Claim 16 Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____

2

Case 1:04-cv-01258-SLR

Document 297

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 4 of 9

2.

For each product listed below, has McKesson proven, by a preponderance

of the evidence, that TriZetto has contributed to the infringement of any asserted claim of the `164 Patent? "Yes" is a finding for McKesson. "No" is a finding for TriZetto. Facets (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (O) Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 6 Claim 8 Claim 9 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 15 Claim 16 Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____

ClaimFacts (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 6 Claim 8 Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____

3

Case 1:04-cv-01258-SLR

Document 297

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 5 of 9

(H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (O)

Claim 9 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 15 Claim 16

Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____

No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____

QicLink (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (O) Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 6 Claim 8 Claim 9 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 15 Claim 16 Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____

4

Case 1:04-cv-01258-SLR

Document 297

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 6 of 9

3.

For each product listed below, has McKesson proven, by a preponderance

of the evidence, that TriZetto has induced the infringement of the `164 Patent? "Yes" is a finding for McKesson. "No" is a finding for TriZetto. Facets (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (O) Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 6 Claim 8 Claim 9 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 15 Claim 16 Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____

ClaimFacts (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 6 Claim 8 Claim 9 Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____

5

Case 1:04-cv-01258-SLR

Document 297

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 7 of 9

(I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (O)

Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 15 Claim 16

Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____

No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____

QicLink (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (O) Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 6 Claim 8 Claim 9 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 15 Claim 16 Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____

6

Case 1:04-cv-01258-SLR

Document 297

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 8 of 9

4.

If you found that TriZetto infringed any claim of the `164 Patent, has

McKesson proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that TriZetto's infringement was willful? "Yes" is a finding for McKesson. "No" is a finding for TriZetto. Yes _____ No _____

DAMAGES Answer the following question only if you find any of the `164 Patent claims infringed.

5.

What is the total amount of damages that should be awarded to McKesson? $______________________________

7

Case 1:04-cv-01258-SLR

Document 297

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 9 of 9

We, the jurors, by signing below, indicate our unanimous verdict.

Jury Foreperson

Juror

Juror

Juror

Juror

Juror

Juror

Juror

8