Free ADR Scheduling Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 130.0 kB
Pages: 7
Date: September 10, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 2,625 Words, 16,261 Characters
Page Size: 595 x 842 pts (A4)
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/200250/3.pdf

Download ADR Scheduling Order - District Court of California ( 130.0 kB)


Preview ADR Scheduling Order - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00870-EMC

Document 3

Filed 02/08/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY D BRIGGS,
No. C 08-00870 EMC Plaintiff (s), v.

SAN MINA SCI,
Defendant(s).

ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Honorable Edward M. Chen. When serving the complaint or notice of removal, the plaintiff or removing defendant must serve on all other parties a copy of this order , the Notice of Assignment of Case to a United States Magistrate Judge for Trial, and all other documents specified in Civil Local Rule 4-2. Counsel must comply with the case schedule listed below unless the Court otherwise orders. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Multi-Option Program governed by ADR Local Rule 3. Counsel and clients shall familiarize themselves with that rule and with the material entitled ADispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California@ on the Court ADR Internet site at www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov. A limited number of printed copies are available from the Clerk=s Office for parties in cases not subject to the court=s Electronic Case Filing program (ECF).

CASE SCHEDULE -ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM
Date Event Governing Rule

2/8/2008 4/23/2008

Complaint filed
*Last day to: $ meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan $ file Joint ADR Certification with Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference FRCivP_26(f) & ADR L.R.3-5 Civil_L.R. 16-8 FRCivP 26(a) (1) Civil _L.R . 16-9

5/7/2008

*Last day to file Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file Case Management Statement per attached Standing Order re Contents of Joint Case Management Statement (also available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov)

5/14/2008

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (CMC) in Courtroom C,15th Floor,SF at 1:30 PM

Civil _L.R. 16-10

* If the Initial Case Management Conference is continued, the other deadlines are continued accordingly.

Case 3:08-cv-00870-EMC

Document 3-2

Filed 02/08/2008

Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL PRACTICE IN CASES ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE EDWARD M. CHEN (8/9/07)

The parties shall follow the General Orders of the Court for the Northern District of California, the Local Rules, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, except as expressly modified herein. Failure to comply with any of the rules and orders may be deemed sufficient grounds for monetary sanctions, dismissal, entry of default judgment, or other appropriate sanctions. The rules and orders are supplemented and modified as follows:

A. 1.

STANDING ORDER RE MOTIONS AND CONFERENCES Criminal Law and Motion is heard on Wednesdays at 9:30 a.m. Civil Law and

Motion is heard on Wednesdays at 10:30 a.m. Counsel need not reserve a hearing date in advance for civil motions. However, noticed dates may be reset as the Court's calendar requires. 2. 3. Case Management Conferences are heard on Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. Pretrial In cases that are randomly assigned to Judge Chen for all purposes, the parties are Conferences are heard on Wednesdays at 3:00 p.m. requested to file their written consent to the assignment of a U.S. Magistrate Judge for all purposes, or their written declination of consent, as soon as possible. 4. 5. 6. All scheduling questions should be addressed to Judge Chen's courtroom deputy, Law and motion matters may be submitted without argument upon stipulation of In all "E-Filing" cases, when filing papers that require the Court to take any Betty Fong, at (415) 522-2034. the parties and notification of the Court no later than two (2) court days before the hearing. action (e.g. motions, meet and confer letters, administrative requests), the parties shall, in addition to filing papers electronically, lodge with chambers a printed copy of the papers on three-hole punch paper (including all exhibits) by the close of the next court day following the day the papers are filed electronically. These printed copies shall be marked "EMC Chambers Copy" and shall be submitted to the Clerk's Office in an envelope clearly marked with the case number, "Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen," and "E-Filing Chambers Copy." Parties shall not file a paper copy of any document with the Clerk's

Case 3:08-cv-00870-EMC

Document 3-2

Filed 02/08/2008

Page 2 of 4

Office that has already been filed electronically. A proposed order in an E-Filing case must be emailed to [email protected] as a WordPerfect attachment on the same day that it is E-Filed. With permission, Chambers' copes of documents may be submitted on CDROM with hypertext links to exhibits. 7. The Court can no longer supply a court reporter. If you wish to have this hearing

recorded by a court reporter rather than by electronic means, please arrange this privately.

B.

STANDING ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTES

This Standing Order applies to all disclosures and discovery motions assigned to Judge Chen and is intended to supplement the Civil Local Rules of this District regarding motion practice (Civil L. R. 7-1 et seq.) and the resolution of disclosure or discovery disputes (Civil L. R. 37-1 et seq.). 8. Discovery motions may be addressed to the Court in three ways. A motion may be noticed on not less than thirty-five (35) days notice pursuant to Civil L. R. 7-2. Alternatively, any party may seek an order shortening time under Civil L. R. 6-3 if the circumstances justify that relief. In emergencies during discovery events (such as depositions), the Court is available pursuant to Civil L. R. 37-1(b). In the event a discovery dispute arises, counsel for the party seeking discovery shall in good faith confer in person with counsel for the party failing to make the discovery in an effort to resolve the dispute without court action, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and Civil L. R. 37-1(a). The meeting must be in person, except where good cause is shown why a telephone meeting is adequate. A declaration setting forth these meet and confer efforts, and the final positions of each party, shall be included in the moving papers. The Court will not consider discovery motions unless the moving party has complied with Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and Civil L. R. 37-1(a). 9. Motions for sanctions shall be filed by separate motion in accordance with the Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and Civil L. R. 37-3. The parties shall comply with their meet and confer obligations pursuant to Civil L. R. 37-1(a). Parties who refuse to meet and confer will be subject to sanctions pursuant to Civil L. R. 37-3. 10. Any party filing an Emergency or Ex Parte Application must contact Judge Chen's courtroom deputy clerk, Betty Fong, at 415/522-2034. PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

Case 3:08-cv-00870-EMC

Document 3-2

Filed 02/08/2008

Page 3 of 4

11.

In responding to requests for documents and materials under Fed. R. Civ. P. 34,

all parties shall affirmatively state in a written response served on all other parties the full extent to which they will produce materials and shall, promptly after the production, confirm in writing that they have produced all such materials so described that are locatable after a diligent search of all locations at which such materials might plausibly exist. It shall not be sufficient to object and/or to state that "responsive" materials will be or have been produced. 12. In searching for responsive materials in connection with a request under Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, parties must search computerized files, emails, voicemails, work files, desk files, calendars and diaries, and any other locations and sources if materials of the type to be produced might plausibly be expected to be found there. 13. Privilege logs shall be promptly provided and must be sufficiently detailed and informative to justify the privilege. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5). No generalized claims of privilege or work product protection shall be permitted. With respect to each communication for which a claim of privilege or work product is made, the asserting party must at the time of its assertion identify: (a) all persons making and receiving the privileged or protected communication; (b) the steps taken to ensure the confidentiality of the communication, including affirmation that no unauthorized persons have received the communication; (c) the date of the communication; and (d) the subject matter of the communication. Failure to furnish this information at the time of the assertion may be deemed a waiver of the privilege or protection. 14. To the maximum extent feasible, all party files and records should be retained and produced in their original form and sequence, including file folders, and the originals should remain available for inspection by any counsel on reasonable notice. 15. As soon as a party has notice of this order, the party shall take such reasonable steps as are necessary to preserve evidence related to the issues presented by the action, including, without limitation, interdiction of any document destruction programs and any ongoing erasures of emails, voicemails, and other electronically recorded material to the extent necessary to preserve information relevant to the issues presented by the action. 16. Except for good cause, no item will be received in evidence if the proponent failed to produce it in the face of a reasonable and proper discovery request covering the item, regardless of whether a motion to overrule any objection thereto was made. DEPOSITIONS 17. Absent extraordinary circumstances, counsel shall consult in advance with opposing counsel and unrepresented proposed deponents to schedule depositions at mutually convenient times and places. Where an agreement cannot be reached as to any party deponent or

Case 3:08-cv-00870-EMC

Document 3-2

Filed 02/08/2008

Page 4 of 4

a deponent represented by counsel of record, the following procedure may be invoked by the party seeking any such deposition. The party seeking such a deposition may notice it at least twenty (20) days in advance. If the noticed date and place is unacceptable to the deponent or the deponent's counsel, then within ten (10) days or receipt of the notice, the deponent or counsel for the deponent must reply and counter-propose in writing an alternative date and place falling within twenty (20) days of the date noticed by the party seeking the deposition. 18. Counsel and parties shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(d)(1). Deposition objections must be as to privilege or form only. Speaking objections are prohibited. When a privilege is claimed, the witness should nevertheless answer questions relevant to the existence, extent or waiver of the privilege, such as the date of a communication, who made the statement, to whom and in whose presence the statement was made, other persons to whom the contents of the statement have been disclosed, and the general subject matter of the statement, unless such information itself is itself privileged. Private conferences between deponents and attorneys in the course of interrogation, including a line of related questions, are improper and prohibited except for the sole purpose of determining whether a privilege should be asserted. SANCTIONS 19. copy. ________________________________ Edward M. Chen United States Magistrate Judge Failure to comply with this Order or the Local Rules of this Court may result in sanctions. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f), Civil L. R. 1-4.

Case 3:08-cv-00870-EMC

Document 3-3

Filed 02/08/2008

Page 1 of 2

STANDING ORDER FOR ALL JUDGES OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CONTENTS OF JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Commencing March 1, 2007, all judges of the Northern District of California will require the identical information in Joint Case Management Statements filed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9. The parties must include the following information in their statement which, except in unusually complex cases, should not exceed ten pages: 1. Jurisdiction and Service: The basis for the court's subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff's claims and defendant's counterclaims, whether any issues exist regarding personal jurisdiction or venue, whether any parties remain to be served, and, if any parties remain to be served, a proposed deadline for service. 2. Facts: A brief chronology of the facts and a statement of the principal factual issues in dispute. 3. Legal Issues: A brief statement, without extended legal argument, of the disputed points of law, including reference to specific statutes and decisions. 4. Motions: All prior and pending motions, their current status, and any anticipated motions.

5. Amendment of Pleadings: The extent to which parties, claims, or defenses are expected to be added or dismissed and a proposed deadline for amending the pleadings. 6. Evidence Preservation: Steps taken to preserve evidence relevant to the issues reasonably evident in this action, including interdiction of any document-destruction program and any ongoing erasures of e-mails, voice mails, and other electronically-recorded material. 7. Disclosures: Whether there has been full and timely compliance with the initial disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and a description of the disclosures made. 8. Discovery: Discovery taken to date, if any, the scope of anticipated discovery, any proposed limitations or modifications of the discovery rules, and a proposed discovery plan pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). 9. Class Actions: If a class action, a proposal for how and when the class will be certified.

10. Related Cases: Any related cases or proceedings pending before another judge of this court, or before another court or administrative body. 11. Relief: All relief sought through complaint or counterclaim, including the amount of any -1-

Case 3:08-cv-00870-EMC

Document 3-3

Filed 02/08/2008

Page 2 of 2

damages sought and a description of the bases on which damages are calculated. In addition, any party from whom damages are sought must describe the bases on which it contends damages should be calculated if liability is established. 12. Settlement and ADR: Prospects for settlement, ADR efforts to date, and a specific ADR plan for the case, including compliance with ADR L.R. 3-5 and a description of key discovery or motions necessary to position the parties to negotiate a resolution. 13. Consent to Magistrate Judge For All Purposes: Whether all parties will consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings including trial and entry of judgment. 14. Other References: Whether the case is suitable for reference to binding arbitration, a special master, or the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. 15. Narrowing of Issues: Issues that can be narrowed by agreement or by motion, suggestions to expedite the presentation of evidence at trial (e.g., through summaries or stipulated facts), and any request to bifurcate issues, claims, or defenses. 16. Expedited Schedule: Whether this is the type of case that can be handled on an expedited basis with streamlined procedures. 17. Scheduling: Proposed dates for designation of experts, discovery cutoff, hearing of dispositive motions, pretrial conference and trial. 18. Trial: Whether the case will be tried to a jury or to the court and the expected length of the trial. 19. Disclosure of Non-party Interested Entities or Persons: Whether each party has filed the "Certification of Interested Entities or Persons" required by Civil Local Rule 3-16. In addition, each party must restate in the case management statement the contents of its certification by identifying any persons, firms, partnerships, corporations (including parent corporations) or other entities known by the party to have either: (i) a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding; or (ii) any other kind of interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding. 20. Such other matters as may facilitate the just, speedy and inexpensive disposition of this matter.

-2-