Free Set/Clear Flags - District Court of California - California


File Size: 83.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: November 13, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 340 Words, 2,337 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196916/25.pdf

Download Set/Clear Flags - District Court of California ( 83.0 kB)


Preview Set/Clear Flags - District Court of California
Case 5:07-cv-03156-JW

Document 25

Filed 11/13/2007

Page 1 of 2
UNIT ED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Morrison

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

CASE NO. 07-03156 JW Plaintiff(s), v.
Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc.

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9
ADR should be stayed pending consolidation with 05-00839. other requested deadline _____________________________________________

11/07/07 Dated:___________

/s/ Wendy Lazerson ____________________________ Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Joseph Gigliotti ____________________________ Attorney for Defendant

11/07/07 Dated:____________

A

C

LI

FO

m Judge Ja

es Ware

R NIA

IT IS S

O ORD

ERED

RT U O

NO

RT

H

Case 5:07-cv-03156-JW

Document 25

Filed 11/13/2007

Page 2 of 2

[PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 9 Non-binding Arbitration 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 9 Mediation 9 Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 9 90 days pending further order of the STAYEDfrom the date of this order. Court. 9 other ___________________ IT IS SO ORDERED. November 13, 2007 Dated:________________

___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE