Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California

Case 4:07-cv-03334-CW

Document 8

Filed 08/01/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 PATRICIA K. GILLETTE (No. 74461) GREG J. RICHARDSON (No. 203788) 2 BROOKE D. ANDRICH (No. 238836) 3 HELLER EHRMAN LLP 333 Bush Street 4 San Francisco, CA 94104-2878 5 Telephone: +1.415.772.6000 Facsimile: +1.415.772.6268 6 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] 7 Email: [email protected] 8 Attorneys for Defendants 9 GREATER BAY BANK, GREATER BAY BANCORP, CHERYL E. HOWELL, KRYSTYNA MARCINIAK, 10 CATHLEEN COLGAN, and ERIC LEE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 v. Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) Judge: Location: Date: Time: Hon. Claudia Wilken Courtroom 2, 4th Floor September 6, 2007 2:00 p.m. GERARD CHANG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION Case No.: C 07-3334 CW

19 GREATER BAY BANK, GREATER BAY BANCORP, CHERYL E. HOWELL, 20 KRYSTYNA MARCINIAK, CATHLEEN 21 COLGAN, ERIC LEE, and DOES 1 TO 50, 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS; CASE NO. C 07-3334 CW

Case 4:07-cv-03334-CW

Document 8

Filed 08/01/2007

Page 2 of 2

1

The motion of Defendants Greater Bay Bank, Greater Bay Bancorp, Cheryl E.

2 Howell, Krystyna Marciniak, Cathleen Colgan, and Eric Lee (collectively, "Defendants") to 3 dismiss Plaintiff Gerard Chang's Complaint came regularly for hearing on September 6, 4 2007, before the Honorable Claudia Wilken in Courtroom 2 of this Court. Brooke D. 5 Andrich appeared as counsel for Defendants and Plaintiff Gerard Chang appeared in pro 6 per. 7 Upon consideration of the moving papers, the pleadings in this action, the arguments

8 of counsel, and all other matters presented, it appears and this Court finds, pursuant to 9 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) that Plaintiff's Complaint fails to state a claim 10 upon which relief can be granted. 11 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

12 IS GRANTED AND THAT PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IN ITS ENTIRETY IS 13 DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS; CASE NO. C 07-3334 CW

DATED: ________________ THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE