Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 12.2 kB
Pages: 1
Date: July 30, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 271 Words, 1,653 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/192444/74.pdf

Download Proposed Order - District Court of California ( 12.2 kB)


Preview Proposed Order - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-02769-JL

Document 74

Filed 07/30/2007

Page 1 of 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

HARVEY SISKIND LLP D. PETER HARVEY (SBN 55712) e-mail: [email protected] SETH I. APPEL (SBN 233421) e-mail: [email protected] Four Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 354-0100 Facsimile: (415) 391-7124 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants in Case No. C 07-2769 JL SEOK KI KIM and STV ASIA, LTD. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION STV ASIA LTD., Plaintiff, v. PRN CORPORATION, PREMIER RETAIL NETWORKS, INC., BEST BUY CO., INC., BEST BUY STORES L.P., CIRCUIT CITY STORES INC., CIRCUIT CITY STORES WEST COAST, INC., COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, WAKEFERN FOOD CORPORATION d/b/a SHOPRITE, and ALBERTSONS, LLC., Defendants. Seok Ki Kim and STV Asia, Ltd. have moved the Court to consider whether Case No. C 061664 JCS and Case No. C 07-2769 JL are related under Local Rule 3-12. Satisfactory proof having been received and good cause appearing therefor: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Case No. C 06-1664 JCS and Case No. C 07-2769 JL are not related, and that Case No. C 07-2769 can proceed before the Honorable James Larson. DATED: ____________________ __________________________________ United States District Court Judge
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED Case No.: C 06-1664 JCS

Case No.: C 06-1664 JCS Possible Related Case No.: C 07-2769 JL [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED