Free Appeal Document - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

C A-ll (rev. 7/00) Page l ot`2
·_ __‘ Us CA DOCKET # (IE KNOWN)
QA
C" Ye -
E It ; A A _ _
jr S? A l
= le it I ·

"~.., ·"° UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
. ‘ CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETIN G STATEMENT A
PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY. _ _
TITLE LN FULLtCGnStanCg pam Maynafdi DISTRICT: AI.iZOn& JUDGE: _E0yaa;;¤0§_; igjigqagjtapld H __ _
an individual, Plaintiff, v. The · `
HAPPPOPS Life Swap TAS ca A POP- DISTRICT CCCRT NCMRRR* CVCR*C525TPRX‘RCR
eign corp. ; Hartfcrd Life Ins. C0. DATE NOTICE OF APPEAL.
and Hartford Life & Accident Ins. FILED:Fabma_,,Y 0 I 2000 IS THIS A cRosS~APPEAI.? Q YES ·
C0. , fcreign corps. ; CNA Group Life ‘ ‘ ‘
Assurance C0. , an IL corp.; Contjn—— IF THIS MATTER HAS BEEN BEFORE THIS COURT PREVIOUSLY,
aata; Caguglty CO_; an IL COI-0_; PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCKET NUMBER AND CITATION {IF ANY):
Hewitt Assoc. LLC, An IL limited
l l T y 00; . ew; n · an, e •¤·= .. .
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF ACTION AND RESULT BELOW: ‘
See Attachment l . I A -
PRINCIPAL ISSUES PROPOSED T0 BE RAISED ON APPEAL: `
See Attachment 2.
PLEASE IDENTIFYIANY UTHER LEGAL PROCEEDING THAT MAY HAVE A BEARING ON THIS CASE (INCLUDE
PENDING DISTRICT coURT PosTJUDc1vIENT MOTIONS): '
Ncne A - ‘
DoES THIS APPEAL INVOLVE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: ` -
Q Possibility of settlement _
Q Likelihood that intervening precedent will control outcome of appeal
Q Likelihood of a motion to expedite or to stay the appeal, or other procedural matters (Specify)
Q Any other information relevant to the inclusion of this case in the Mediation Program

Possibility parties would stipulate to binding awardby Appellate Commissioner 111 lieu of Submission to Judges
. LOWER COURT INFORMATION ` A n
Case 2:O4—cv—OO525-RCB Document 1 12 Filed O2/O8/2006 Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2
JURISDICTION DISTRICT COURT DISPOSITION ‘
FEDERAL APPELLATE TYPE OF JUDGMENT/ORDER APPEALED RELIEF n
Q FEDERAL Q FINAL DECISION OF Q DEFAULT JUDGMENT Q DAMAGES: EPISA
QUESTION DISTRICT COURT SOUGHT 3 Benefits
Q DISMISSAL/JURISDICTION AWARDED $ n
E DIVERSITY Q mTERL0cuT0RY Q D1sM1ssALrMEmTs Q IN]UNCI`IONS:
DECISION APPEALABLE -
Q OTHER AS OF RIGHT _@_ SUMMARY JUDGMENT Q PRELIMINARY n n
(SPECIEYI U xUDGMENTxceURT Ecrsre
Q INTERLOCUTORY _ D N Q PERMANENT
ORDER CERTIFIED EY Q JUDGMENT/JURY vER01cT
DISTRICT JUDGE — Q GRANTED
(SPECIFYY Q DEcLA12AT0RY JUDGMENT Q DENIED
Q JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
Q OTHER E Q ATTORNEY FEES:
(SPECIFY). Q OTHER (SPECIFY): SOUGHT $
AWARDED $ f
Q PENDING
Q COSTS: $
CERTIFICATION OF COUNSEL I
I CERTTFY THAT: -
I. COPIES OF ORDERJIUDGMENT APPEALED FROM ARE AT TACHED. (See Attachments 3 I 4 I 5 and 6 _)
2. A CURRENT SERVICE LIST OR REPRESENTATION STATEMENT WITH TELEPHONE AND FAX NUMBERS IS ATTACHED (SEE 9TH 2
cuz RULE 3-2). (see Attaclnmem; 7 . ) ;
3. A COPY OF TI-HS CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT WAS SERVED IN COMPLIANCE WITH FRAP 25. Z
4. IUNDERSTAND THAT FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THESE FILING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS,
INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THIS APPEAL. _
s/ David F . Gcmez E'eb1Cuafy 8 , 2006 `
Signature Date
COUNSEL WHO COMPLETED THIS FORM Q
NAME; David F . Gcmez , Esq .
FIRM: Gomez & Petitti , P .C .
ADDRESS: E . Read., SUIEG I
. Phoenix, AZ 85016 i
E-MAIL: n
O !‘!I}II\‘ an I- _
TELEPHONE: .· _ =·=· n
FAX: _. _ _ ,= 4
¤N=THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD BE FILED IN TIIE DISTRICT COURT WITH THE NOTICE OF APPEAL=|(<
=I¤IF FILED LATE, IT SHOULD BE FILED DIRECTLY WITH THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS>K¤
Case 2:O4—cv—OO525-RCB Document 1 12 Filed O2/O8/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00525-RCB

Document 112

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00525-RCB

Document 112

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 2 of 2