Free Mandate of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT i
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 04-10649
D.C. No. CR—04-00822-JAT
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
V JUDGMENT
MIGUEL ANGEL DIAZ-ROSAS, _ V
if V Ai C C ljefendantiigppellant. Owl W- C w NAV C kiwi 7 M C if W M W C
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
(Phoenix).
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this
Court, that the appeal in this cause be, and hereby is DISMISSED.
Filed and entered 12/14/05
A rRuE,::¤PY
C i 2:21.2¢ééGl·"“s°"
_ ’ ‘ AITESI
1 I P MAY 1 2 zcut
by: DeP!ii\l 9***
Case 2:04-cr—00822-JAT Document 37 Filed 05/12/2006 Page 1 of 3

OR|C;E!!\!/—\L . FILED
0
UNITED STATES counr OF APPEALS °,§QTf,’g@’g§'@';SQ§gg;{*;K
· FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
A l UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. O4-10649
Plaintiff- Appellee, I ~ D.C. No. CR-04-00822-JAT
7 VJ, . ,7 ,__ 7 I- -7 _,_ 7 ·in` 7 A/`H A -P-».( ra., v,_. - V-
_ MEMORANDUM" I ` `
MIGUEL ANGEL DIAZ-ROSAS, `
Defendant -— Appellant. » .
Appeal from the United States District Court I
for the District of Arizona _
. James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding
p Submitted December 5, 2003** °
i Before: GOODWIN, W. FLETCHER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
P P' P i viviiguel Angelrbiazaliosas appealsfrom - P is * I ’
sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § l326(a),
with sentencing enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § l326(b)(2).
* I This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be
‘ cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
" This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). V
Case 2:04-cr—00822-JAT Document 37 Filed 05/12/2006 Page 2 of 3i

3 Diaz-Rosas, who was sentenced underthe mandatory Sentencing Guidelines
beforethe Supreme Court its issued its decision in United States v. Booker, 125 S.
Ct. 738 (2005), asserts that the district court erred by determining that his prior
criminal conviction constituted an act of violence for purposes of a sentencing
A enhancement. 1
We dismiss the appeal because Diaz-Rosas, in his plea agreement,
81* `C 5 knowingly and volu1ita11lyVv5i@lii§gHtt6 aHeaT. S'eelUrE?eYz'Y8'tate$‘ v.tC0rtez4‘ A S
Arias, 403 F .3d llll (9th Cir. 2005), as czmenided, No.04-10184, 2005 WL
2401877 (9th Cir. Sept. 30, 2005) (holding that pre-Booker Waiver of right to
` appeal ipreciudes appellate relief under Booker). -
1 DISMISSED. _ ‘ . - l
V Case 2:04-cr—00822-JAT Document 37 Filed 05/12/2006 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:04-cr-00822-JAT

Document 37

Filed 05/12/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cr-00822-JAT

Document 37

Filed 05/12/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cr-00822-JAT

Document 37

Filed 05/12/2006

Page 3 of 3