Free Order of Detention - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

WO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU .».¤¤•*
SIS. M. ....a .w..w... ._SI I_S_ .___ia__ u -·-·_.”_
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CLERK U S DBTRICT cmg;
v. ORDER OF DETE '
Bt'...,...._______ DEPU'I’Y_
Fernando Cuevas-Molina Case Number: CR 03-00914-001-PHX-JA
In accordance with the Ball Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), a detention hearing was held on May 17, 2006. Defendant was present
and was represented by counsel. I conclude by a preponderance of the evidence the defendant is a flight risk and order the detention
of the defendant pending trial in this case.
FINDINGS OF FACT
I find by a eponderance of the evidence that:
The defendant is not a citizen ofthe United States or lawfully admitted for permanent residence.
The defendant, at the time of the charged offense, was in the United States illegally.
lf released herein, the defendant faces removal proceedings by the Bureau of Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, placing him/her beyond thejurisdiction of this Court and the defendant has previously been deported
or othenmse removed.
The defendant has no significant contacts in the United States or in the District of Arizona.
The defendant has no resources in the United States from which he/she might make a bond reasonably calculated
to assure his/her future appearance.
% The defendant has a prior criminal history.
The defendant lives/works in Mexico.
I:] The defendant is an amnesty applicant but has no substantial ties in Arizona or in the United States and has
substantial family ties to Mexico.
Ei There is a record of prior failure to appear in court as ordered.
[I The defendant attempted to evade law enforcement contact by fleeing from law enforcement.
EI The defendant is facing a maximum of years imprisonment.
The Court incorporates by reference the material findings of the Pretrial Services Agency which were reviewed by the Coun
at the time of the hearing in this matter, except as noted in the record.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. There is _a serious risk that the defendant will flee.
2. No condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required.
DIRECTIONS REGARDING DETENTION
The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his/her designated representative for confinement in
a corrections facility separate, tothe extent practicable, from persons awaitin g or sewing sentences or being held in custody pending
appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On order of a court
of the United States or on request of an attomey for the Govemment, he person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the
defendant to the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.
APPEALS AND THIRD PARTY RELEASE
_ IT IS ORDERED that should an appeal of this detention order be filed with the District Court, it is counseI's responsibility to
gelivrer a copy of the motion for review/reconsideration to Pretrial Services at least one day prior to the hearing set before the Dis rict
ou .
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a release to a third party is to be considered, it is counsel's responsibility to notify Pretrial
Services sufficiently in advance of the hearing before the District Court to allow Pretrial Services an opportunity to interview and
investigate the potential third party custodian.
DATE: May 17, 2006
. I
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 2:03-cr—00914-JAT Document 31 Filed 05/17/2006 Page 1 of 1

Case 2:03-cr-00914-JAT

Document 31

Filed 05/17/2006

Page 1 of 1