Free Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:08-cr-00009-GMS

Document 25

Filed 05/09/2008

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, v. KEVIN LAMONT MASON, Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) Criminal Action No. 08-09-GMS ) ) ) )

MOTION FOR A TELEPHONE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE The United States, by and through Colm F. Connolly, United States Attorney for the District of Delaware, and Shawn A. Weede, Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Delaware, hereby moves the Court to set a scheduling conference in the above-captioned case for the reasons set forth below: 1. 2. The Grand Jury returned an Indictment against the defendant on January 22, 2008. The Government has spoken with counsel for the defendant, Stephen P. Patrizio,

Esquire, who has indicated that the defendant wishes to change his plea. 3. The parties respectfully request that the Court set a telephone scheduling conference

in order to set a date for a change of plea hearing.

Case 1:08-cr-00009-GMS

Document 25

Filed 05/09/2008

Page 2 of 3

4.

The Government requests that the Court exclude the time from the date of this

motion until the date set for the telephone scheduling conference under the Speedy Trial Act (18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq.). The Government submits that the time is excludable because the ends of justice served by the delay outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h).

COLM F. CONNOLLY United States Attorney

BY:

Shawn A. Weede Shawn A. Weede Assistant United States Attorney 1007 Orange Street, Suite 700 P.O. Box 2046 Wilmington, Delaware 19899-2046

Dated: May 9, 2008

2

Case 1:08-cr-00009-GMS

Document 25

Filed 05/09/2008

Page 3 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, v. KEVIN LAMONT MASON, Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) Criminal Action No. 08-09-GMS ) ) ) ) ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this ___ day of _____________________, 2008, that 1. A telephone scheduling conference in this matter will be held on the _____ day of

___________________ at ________.m., with the Court initiating said call; 2. Because the delay outweighs the interest of the defendant and the public in a speedy

trial, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time between the date of this Order and the date of the telephone scheduling conference are excluded from computation of the Speedy Trial Act in the interests of justice, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

__________________________________ HONORABLE GREGORY M. SLEET CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3