Free Order of Detention - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 125.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 14, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 844 Words, 5,028 Characters
Page Size: 611 x 801 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/39384/9.pdf

Download Order of Detention - District Court of Delaware ( 125.3 kB)


Preview Order of Detention - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :07-cr-00163-JJF Document 9 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
% AO 472 (Rev. 3/S6) Order of Detention Pending Trial
District of Delaware
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
V. ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL
Deoddrick Shaheed Purnell Case O -7__ /6 *3
Defe/zdam
In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, IS U.S.C. § 3 l42(f), a detention hearing has been held. I conclude that the following facts require the
detention ofthe defendant pending trial in this case.
Part I—Findings of Fact
Q (I) The defendant is charged with an offense described in IS U.S.C. § 3 l42(f)(l) and has been convicted ofa Q federal offense Q state
or local offense that would have been a federal offense ifa circumstance giving rise to federal jurisdiction had existed that is
Q a crime of violence as defined in IS U.S.C. § 3I56(a)(4).
Q an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death.
Q an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment often years or more is prescribed in
>l<
Q a felony that was committed after the defendant had been convicted of two or more prior federal offenses described in IS U.S.C.
§ 3l42(f)(I)(A)-(C), or comparable state or local offenses.
Q (2) The offense described in finding (I) was committed while the defendant was on release pending trial for a federal, state or local offense.
Q (3) A period of not more than five years has elapsed since the Q date of conviction Q release ofthe defendant from imprisonment
. for the offense described in finding (I).
Q (4) Findings Nos. (I), (2) and (3) establish a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the
safety of (an) other person(s) and the community. I further find that the defendant has not rebutted this presumption.
Alternative Findings (A)
7 (I) There is probable cause to believe that the defendant has committed an offense
for which a maximum term of imprisonment often years or more is prescribed in .
Q under IS U.S.C. § 924(c).
Q (2) The defendant has not rebutted the presumption established by finding I that no condition or combination ofconditions will reasonably assure
the appearance ofthe defendant as required and the safety ofthe community.
Alternative Findings (B)
(I) There is a serious risk that the defendant will not appear.
(2) There is a serious risk that the defendant will endanger the safety of another person or the community.
Part II—Written Statement of Reasons for Detention
I find that the credible testimony and information submitted at the hearing establishes by X clear and convincing evidence X a prepon-
derance ofthe evidence: Defendant is charged with felon in possession ofa firearm in violation of IS USC § 922. The evidence shows that although
defendant has ajob, it is seasonal. His only financial resource was $4,900 seized from his person at the time ofhis arrest. I—Ie was in a vehicle with
his co—defendant, Vessels. It is known that in their area a kid was shot. Defendant admitted that the weapon was his. In 2002 defendant pled guilty
forgery 2d and was found guilty ofVOP for every year from 2003 through 2005, For his last VOP he was sentenced to 4 month conhnement.
When he was ajuvenile, he was adjudicated delinquent for carrying a concealed deadly weapon. I-Ie has an outstanding warrant for failure to pay a
fine. Although defendant is a lifelong resident and has strong family ties, those factors have not prevented him from being involved in
criminal activity and prevent him from violating probation on three occasions. I—Ie does not appear conducive to pretrial release in light of his past
criminal history which includes possession ofa weapon and his VOPs.
T
LIS. DISTRICT COUR
Diamant OF DELAWARE

Case 1 :07-cr-00163-JJF Document 9 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
%. AO 472 (Rev. 3/86) Order ofDetention Pending Trial
Part III—Directi0ns Regarding Detention
The defendant is committed to the custody ofthe Attorney General or his designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate,
to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a
reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attomey for the
Government, the person in charge ofthe corrections facility shall deliver the defenda • United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in
connection with a court proceeding.
December 14, 2007 Q- fizjz
Date tv Signmu fl icial Officer
Mary Pat ynge, Magistrate Judge
Name and Title 0fJudicia! Ojicer
*1nsert as applicable: (a) Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 801 ez seq.); (b) Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. § 951 ez
seq.); or (c) Section 1 ofActofSept. 15, 1980 (21 U.S.C. §955a).

Case 1:07-cr-00163-JJF

Document 9

Filed 12/14/2007

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cr-00163-JJF

Document 9

Filed 12/14/2007

Page 2 of 2