PET IT TON FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES CONGRESSIONAL
GLOBE ARTICLE ONE CONSTTTUTHON or Tins UNITED STATES
BILL OF RIGHTS DECEMBER 15TH,179l
l l ·j'/iw-···vJ¢v}
BY EXPARTE Writ 0f Mandamus and Inquiry
j _ _ , ,__.,¤, ;C"rr°
t James Coppedge petitioner aggrieved “’ fil Zlllli 1 Q
rs tl
U.S.D1STRlCT COURT CLERK U.
. tw _ . EELSWARE 5
Introduction " “
An monotarv default Judgment was entered by a notarv witness in a private adminstrative
process against the Judgment debtor City of Pliiladelplua via its tortteasor employees and
attorney's the matter was mutually agreed & transferred by the plaintiff to a new venue to
protect the interest of preserving contract from circumvention by the City of Philadelphia
attorney‘s and agents.The said U.S. District Court clerk was suppose to assign the matter
over to an magistrate under Title 9 usc l, 2,4,202,203,204,206,301,303,304 for
compulsory sanctions irrevocable or issue an U.S. Marshall. form to the plaintiff
for immediate execution of the said judgment under Title 22 section 25 8(b) instead the
clerk improperly file the action giving the already adjudged Judgment Debtors 60 days
which circumvents our original agreement whereas Congress or the Senate must compel
the clerk to cancel the said 60 response to the complaint and immediately bring the matter
before a magistrate to execution of the said Judgment sine die see all evidence .
Interrogatories
1. True or false is a notary an officer of the court?
2. Lt` true doesn’1 their seal on a documentation constitute a legal contract?
3. Why is the the U.S.District Court Clerk Circutuventing the Default terms by allowing an extra 60 days
to answer the complaint never answered the original 10 days ?
4. Does the U.S. Distict Court enforce Admiralty Maritime awards title 28 section l333?
5. lf so, do the Courts enforce it to the letter of the agreement prescribed under federal supplymental rules
c (a)?
6.W11at is the duties of the U.S. District Court Clerk in the relationship under title 22 section 258(b)?
7 .1s my affidavit of negative averrnent default terms an admiralty maritime a.ward contract?
Basis of Jurisdiction
Title 2 congressional investieation
Title 42, Section l98l(b), Title 28 USC 1251, 1331, 1333 , 16518; 1361 Title 22 section 258 (b)
Federal tort claims act 28 usc 13-16(b)Tit1e 9 usc 1, 2,4,202,203,204,206,30l,303,304
TABLES OF AUTHORHES
negligence on part of U.S. District Court clerk pursuant to richard vs U.S. 369 U.S. 1 {1962
also gross negligence scelig vs first national bank ,d.c.ill;20 f.sup_n.61,68 under rule c gat To enforce
any maritime 11n
Statements
_ Case 1 :O7—cv—OO684-Gl\/IS Document 8 Filed 12/O4/2007 Page 2 of 3
The clerk failed to turn the matter over to the U.S. District Court military Judge and enforce the contract
strictly under terms of title 9 usc lr 2,4,202,203,204,206,30l,303,304 Title 22 section 25S(b), and
conditions already stipulated in the a.ffrdatrit.of111o11otar5’ stipulatioit their breaching my security and could
cause the U.S. a For protit corporation liability on the ICH million dollar judgment against the City of
Pltilaclelpliia by silence mutually agreed to waive service under city state or federal rules ofthe complaint
once the default terms stipulated goes into effect. .
Reasons for Granting Writ
The obligations stipulated are not carried out to the letter which allows room for omniission
on the courts for liabilities , unless the stipulation are carried out and compelled via watchful
eye of congress under Title 9 usc. Section 1, 2,4,202,2l}3,204.206:301,303,304 This
Compels Congress and the Senate to uphold article 1 petition for redress of grievances via
this writ of mandamus and lngui;y.Due to the negligent adminstration of the default stipulation
bv the US District Court Clerk who is not following the contract stipulations to the letter.
Conclusion
I need an ORDER Directing clerk to enter iudgment andfor execute complusorv order for the
immediate pavment of ten million directed to the Citv of Philadenhia
Served to Congress pursuant to Title.28 section 2073 , fr.o.e. 902
Title'? section 1901 investigation.
- / _ {7; /7 Q fQ6_/&»;. /ig;/, y , at/·
./I fl '"n
l·
-
pi
. IQ `
\__ _’ xr
"' s HELD mime. 5261 5?“lE
5—- FX (2
Qi; gse;
f #4 . `X C `\ 3
tgt: ` ‘
rh. S » YQ
•§•'I " ‘ x" 7 J
*5 N, Q
*5. `TB ' t. 2.i» f U
LM I {-\ Q §_ :";, ff`;
•.|Z\W
V'; EN "’ »
€\ _ ’ - iii;
E F ----
\ R
M
QQ)
ZT" C'. I
‘ N . l ` :i:;;: i .
J gg ..¤.,.
é mJ~ Q§§§[j
_ £€EEE:x _°
"‘—" as " ¤.¤.== §
E —-1————â€""‘ ‘ “`° ;
;___ \.~A ` J
E,. ...... '
E. .
4 E; ` Jam ;§_§Q5YIQ /
"““ gu"! §z,~=2;£;,,,.zz.-4 3
I —· l ‘_gEC!('J ` -
N dg ? gi; ¤..`
gm 3* Q F =
· h
Case 1:07-cv-00684-GMS
Document 8
Filed 12/04/2007
Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-00684-GMS
Document 8
Filed 12/04/2007
Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-00684-GMS
Document 8
Filed 12/04/2007
Page 3 of 3
United States Free Forms
Canada Free Forms
United Kingdom Free Forms
Australia Free Forms