Free Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 74.2 kB
Pages: 2
Date: March 2, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 452 Words, 2,490 Characters
Page Size: 611 x 801 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/37866/7.pdf

Download Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware ( 74.2 kB)


Preview Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware
‘ _ Case 1 :07-cr-00029-GIVIS Document 7 Filed O2/27/2007 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES AMERICA, )
_ Plaintiff, g y
I I ·v. g Criminal Action No. 07- -» UFJA I
KELIN BRADLEY I g
_ I Defendants. g E fx I I I
t INDICTMENT I III I' I I II`` · Y I
» · - The Grand Jury for the District of Delaware charges that: ~ `
COUNT ONE
I on or-aboutIFebrua1y 10, 2007, in the State and District of Delaware, Defendant Kelin Bradley,
with intent to defraud, did pass falsely made, forged and counterfeited obligations of the United
States, that is, Federal Reserve Notes, which he then knew to be falsely made, forged and
A counterfeited, in violationIof Title 18, United States Code, Section 472.
- I NOTICE OF FORFEITURE I
II I Upon conviction of the offense alleged in Count One of this Indictment, Defendant Kelin I I
Bradley shall forfeit to the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 492, 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2)(B), and I
28 U.S.C. § 246l(c), any counterfeits of any coins or obligations or other securities of theIUnited II
_ I States; as well as any property constituting or deriveId from, proceeds the person obtained directly
I I or indirectly asthe result of such violation. I I
I I IIf any of the above-described Iforfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the
` defendant: (a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; (b) has been transferred or sold I I
I V to, or deposited with, a third party; (c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction ofthe court; (d) has I
I been substantially diminished in value; or (e) has been commingled with other property which cannot ‘
I I _l I y I
lgF|lE__l_1__gT? _.g yygg
_ ‘ I FEB 2 F ` I , - I

’ V Case 1 :07-cr-00029-GIVIS Document 7 Filed O2/27/2007 Page 2 of 2 . _.
l be divided without difficulty; it is the intent ofthe United States, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 982(b) and 4
l 21 U.S.C. 853(p), to seek forfeiture of any other property of said defendant up to the value of the
forfeitable property described above. l S
._ . All pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 492, 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2)(B), 21 U.S.C. »§'853(p), 28 U.S.C. §
2461(c), and Fed. R; Crim. P. 32.2.
1 . . A TRUE BILL: l
- — A Foreperson · - l
I COLM F. CONNOLLY
UNITED-STATES ATTORNEY
A 2 By; M¤~/%'/ = A
‘ Robert F. Kravetz _ " `
t Assistant U.S. Attorney - » _
Dated: February 27, 2007 r _