Free Answer to Counterclaim - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 19.1 kB
Pages: 5
Date: May 7, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 944 Words, 6,162 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/37827/8.pdf

Download Answer to Counterclaim - District Court of Delaware ( 19.1 kB)


Preview Answer to Counterclaim - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cv-00113-GMS

Document 8

Filed 05/07/2007

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ____________________________________ ) CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., and ) CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC., ) ) Civil Action No. 07-113-GMS Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL TELCORDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) CISCO'S ANSWER AND DEFENSES TO TELCORDIA'S COUNTERCLAIMS Plaintiffs Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Cisco Systems") and Cisco Technology, Inc. ("Cisco Technology") (collectively "Cisco"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby respond to the Counterclaims for Declaratory Judgment of Defendant Telcordia Technologies, Inc. ("Telcordia") by admitting, denying, and alleging as follows (for ease of reference Cisco begins with paragraph number 20, which is the first numbered paragraph of Telcordia's Counterclaims): THE PARTIES 20. Cisco is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to

the truth of the allegations of paragraph 20 of Telcordia's Counterclaims and therefore denies those allegations. 21. Cisco admits that it resides in California. Except as so admitted, Cisco

denies any remaining allegations in paragraph 21 of Telcordia's Counterclaims. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 22. 23. Cisco admits that venue in this district is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391. Cisco admits that an actual controversy exists between Cisco and Telcordia

as to whether the Asserted Patents are valid, enforceable and infringed by Telcordia. Except as so admitted, Cisco denies any remaining allegations in paragraph 23 of Telcordia's Counterclaims.

Case 1:07-cv-00113-GMS

Document 8

Filed 05/07/2007

Page 2 of 5

24.

Cisco admits that venue in this judicial district is proper for the adjudication

of Telcordia's Counterclaims. Except as so admitted, Cisco denies any remaining allegations in paragraph 24 of Telcordia's Counterclaims. COUNTERCLAIM FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT 25. Cisco admits that Telcordia purports to allege a cause of action for

declaratory judgment of patent invalidity, uneforceability, and noninfringement under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 1338(a). Except as so admitted, Cisco denies any remaining allegations in paragraph 25 of Telcordia's Counterclaims. 26. Cisco admits that Telcordia seeks a declaration that it has not infringed and

is not infringing any of the Asserted Patents, directly, contributorily, or by inducement. Except as so admitted, Cisco denies any remaining allegations in paragraph 26 of Telcordia's Counterclaims. 27. Cisco admits that Telcordia seeks a declaration that the asserted claims of

the Asserted Patents are invalid and/or unenforceable for failure to meet the requirements of one or more sections of Title 35, United States Code. Except as so admitted, Cisco denies any remaining allegations in paragraph 27 of Telcordia's Counterclaims. PRAYER FOR RELIEF 28. Relief. CISCO'S DEFENSES 29. In addition to the defenses described below, Cisco reserves the right to Cisco denies that Telcordia is entitled to the relief it seeks in its Prayer for

allege additional defenses as they become known through the course of discovery. 30. Telcordia's Counterclaims are barred in whole or in part because they fail to

state a claim on which relief can be granted. 31. Telcordia's claims are barred in whole or in part because Telcordia has not

suffered, and will not suffer, any detriment, injury or damage.

2

Case 1:07-cv-00113-GMS

Document 8

Filed 05/07/2007

Page 3 of 5

PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Cisco prays for judgment as follows: A. That Telcordia's Counterclaims and all claims asserted against Cisco be

dismissed with prejudice, that Judgment be entered in favor of Cisco, and that Telcordia take nothing; B. C. That Telcordia be adjudged to have infringed the '622 and '988 Patents; That Telcordia, its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and

those persons in active concert or participation with any of them, be preliminarily and permanently restrained and enjoined from directly or indirectly infringing the '622 and '988 Patents; D. An award of damages to compensate Cisco for Telcordia's infringement,

pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284, said damages to be trebled because of Telcordia's willful infringement; E. An assessment of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs against

Telcordia, together with an award of such interest and costs; F. That Telcordia be directed to pay Cisco's attorneys' fees incurred in

connection with this lawsuit pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285; and G. and proper. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Cisco demands a trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury in this Action. That Cisco have such other and further relief as this Court may deem just

3

Case 1:07-cv-00113-GMS

Document 8

Filed 05/07/2007

Page 4 of 5

MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP /s/ Jack B. Blumenfeld (No. 1014) __________________________________________ Jack B. Blumenfeld (No. 1014) Leslie A. Polizoti (No. 4299) 1201 North Market Street P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, DE 19899-1347 (302) 658-9200 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Cisco Systems, Inc. and Cisco Technology, Inc.

Of Counsel: Matthew D. Powers Edward R. Reines WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 (650) 802-3000 Paul E. Torchia WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153 (212) 310-8000 May 7, 2007
820822

4

Case 1:07-cv-00113-GMS

Document 8

Filed 05/07/2007

Page 5 of 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Jack B. Blumenfeld, hereby certify that on May 7, 2007 I electronically filed the foregoing document, which will send notification of such filing(s) to the following: Steven J. Balick John G. Day Ashby & Geddes I also certify that copies were caused to be served on May 7, 2007 upon the following in the manner indicated: BY HAND Steven J. Balick John G. Day Ashby & Geddes 500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor Wilmington, DE 19899 BY FEDERAL EXPRESS Vincent P. Kovalick Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P. 901 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20001

/s/ Jack B. Blumenfeld (No. 1014) ________________________ [email protected] (#1014)