Free Mail Returned - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:06-cx/:.00053-JJF Document 61 Filed 07/07/2006 Page 1 of 4
- - ‘`7· Qr :
Q |.¤ _ =.-;_ tht l J
-1 . ·
.»·/‘ '{ @0 7 E
0 0 IU i ·- QZ Q O 0%
·¤ r' ‘ _ U3 Z g -
0 2 U? . O > jj 5 /
- ( C ; mr-X '— . · »
E; Q? “?’ S E -< ‘ /
. mE >$2§ H I
g - n: .00 -:u — _ — -
-. - 0 cn cn rn —| Z. z
’ [-rg ‘ _, C G} ‘
0<-gg L5 5* 0
. * _ I U rg l , Z Z
_ · 1*2- _ 7 O6<¤S3kA1T 2- ·
S ‘ \ 0 :»=·E gx?\
, ·’ \_ \Q` I og- {$ ; _
fg ` . ° ayiiry · xx
;··· ·
Fm: \Q - \§'\ N -‘ ;
00 E; QS? ?® K E? mi I 7
g" \' E “* N 0"·?f -" 5/
‘ — `* m `“\ *0
* ?“ (`\ § - _ ; Q.
‘ :,, _; - 5 M fa ,i }§·r=§£ gi
¤··=· ::¤T??§a; ` , \ - gg}; · " -5: Q
@ e"` %I_,j I
· 8-G :. -
7 _ . gg? ..../-4 - -
__ °. ` g $ 3: ·-Q 5-
M; " E3 ¤ < 7

Case1:06-cv-000530-JJF D0cument61 Filed 07/07/2006 Page20f4
¤————--- l
sj: y` V •-J
7 - 0 0 / a> 7 7
‘ 7 WJ 7 _ 7 ?
"ig 0 i
r 2-.* gi S § ¤
. LJ ix
» ¤ N 0 g 2 7
- E w `
2 I G /
- 0 W 0
1 Q 0 °"
7 - qu r
{ #2, M N
:I| C} l ~
7, 7 7 Uk.?
Lg :4
~€3»·»•1-IO U n
0 . - - . —-*‘*'°“ sg
*·?` /7 @7%
-7 ` ` no EE
0 m? 6/ Lé E?
·. - 1a1'|rn J
. égg aa iw
€°*"£ *¤ O Z °:£’» -
7+-·¤ rn u.
ME
neégg S 7;- g·E,%,§
. ~7 fssmg ; Q zzég
. 7 .0/BBW- 2 - Z§¤—
_ 7 77 Evnig if I’._;P_£°" .
0 a ¤;;§ ¤ 7 §;§ 7
M0 KEN
. 0; gg: 7

ja Case 1 :06-cv-00053-JJF Document 61 Filed 07/07/2006 Page 3 of 4
‘ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
"·f§$t?ii‘i8i"i§i* 8‘£i...i¤?¢iA8E’ ‘
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE 28% 27 5-3
JAMES A. WILSON, etal., )
I I
Plaintiffs, )
I
v. ) Civ. No. 06-53-KAJ
I
HELEN LOHMAN, SCOTT ) g _
MORGAN, TOM CARVAN, JAY )
PLUMMER, and JOE FIELDS, ) _
I
Defendants. )
ORDER n
WHEREAS, the plaintiffs tiled a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 i
without prepayment of the tiling fee;
WHEREAS, orders mailed to plaintiffs were returned as undeliverable to severai
plaintiffs on the following dates as listed below:
Nathaniel Bull March 9, 2006 D.I. 17
Lawrence Collohan . February 27, 2006 D.l. 11
March 8, 2006 D.|. 16
March 15, 2006 D.I. 23
March 24, 2006 D.|. 26
April 4, 2006 D.l. 36
May 19, 2006 D.|. 42 {
James Eley March 9, 2006 I D.l. 18
Charles Hitchens May 19, 2006 D.I. 41
\/Wiliam H. HOIloman,‘Jr. March 9, 2006 D.i. 20
_ Lawrence King March 15, 2006 D.i. 22
March 24, 2006 D.l. 28
_. _ . April 4, 2006 _ D.|. 35
May 19,2006 D.|. 40 ‘-

{ Case 1 :06-cv-00053-JJF Document 61 Filed 07/07/2006 Page 4 of 4
Samuel l\/lcGlatton March 24, 2006 D.l. 27
April 4, 2006 D.l. 34
May 19, 2006 D.l. 39
Robert Scott February 27, 2006 D.l. 10
March 9, 2006 D.l. 19
March 15, 2006 D.l. 21
|\/Iarch 24, 2006 D.|. 29
April 4, 2006 D.l. 33 -
WHEREAS, the above listed plaintiffs apparently have either been released from
custody or transferred to a different institution, and have failed to inform the court of l
l
their new addresses;
WHEREAS, other plaintiffs have filed pleadings in this case, but the above listed
plaintiffs have taken no action in this matter for a period ofat least three months; E
THEREFORE, lT iS ORDERED that, on or before July 27, 2006, the above 1
listed plaintiffs shall show cause why they should not be dismissed from the case for ,
I
failure to inform the court of their current address and for failure to take any action in
the case. I /
4
_ uumzo st/we ict Juoe
DATED: [
2