Free Stipulation to EXTEND Time - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 44.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 365 Words, 2,439 Characters
Page Size: 622 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/34717/9-1.pdf

Download Stipulation to EXTEND Time - District Court of Delaware ( 44.8 kB)


Preview Stipulation to EXTEND Time - District Court of Delaware
1
Case 1 :05-cv-00236-SLR Document 9 Filed 07/01 /2005 Page 1 of 2
1
1
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
1
AIG RETIREMENT SERVICE, INC, )
1 et al., )
l
Plaintiff, )
1 )
v ) Civil Action Ne, 05-236-SLR
1 )
ALTUS FINANCE, SA, et all )
>
Defendants, )
)
and )
1 )
AURORA NATIONAL LIFE )
ASSURANCE COMPANY and )
NEW CALIFORNIA LIFE )
HOLDINGS, ENC., )
)
Nominal Defendants. )

1 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER,
MOVE. OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
1
Plaintiff, AIG I{etire11ientSea“viee, Inc. ("Plaintiff‘), and Nominal Defendants, Aurora
National Life Assurance Company and New California Life Holdings, Inc, {collectively
"Nominal Defendants") hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the Courfs approval, to extend the
deadline for Nominal Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs

Complaint
WHEREAS, this action was tiled hy Plaintiff in the Court of Chancery for the State of
Delaware and subsequently removed to this Court on April 25, 2005, and
1
Wl·IEREAS, prior to this action being removed to this Court, Plaintiff and Nominal
1
Defendants agreed to extend the deadline for Nominal Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise
respond to the Complaint through July ll, 2005, and
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Case 1:05-cv-00236-SLR Document 9 Filed 07/O1/2005 Page 2 of 2
Wi—lIii2.E./XS, Plaintiff and `Nominal Defendants desire to t”ur·tl1er‘ extend the deadline for
Nominal Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint,
ll iS IIEREBY STIPULATEID AND AGREED ttiatNon‘1inaE Defendants shall have until
the later of {i} August 1, 2005; or (ii) if a motion to dismiss is filed by any defendant, twenty days
after the Conrt‘s resolution of any such motion, for the Nominal Defendants to answer, move, or
otherwise respond to the Complaint.
Respectfully submitted,
MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL PHILLES, GOLDMAN & SPENCE, P A.
/ .
QAM as
Kean tl Nat:liba1l(#2067) lonnit? Ptiilli , I . (#110)
Megan Ward Casoio (#3575) Bri .Farna #4089)
t20l Nortli lviarket Street 1200 North Broom Street
PO. Box l.3· Wilmington, DE l9S99»t 347 {302) 655-4200
(302) 65B~92€lG -
Attorneys fb1"Nosninal Defendants
Attorneys for Plaintiff
IT IS HEREBY SO ORDERED
Date:
The Honorable Sue L. Robinson
United States Dismct Judge