Free USCA Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 48.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: February 1, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 419 Words, 2,463 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9774/47.pdf

Download USCA Order - District Court of Connecticut ( 48.4 kB)


Preview USCA Order - District Court of Connecticut
I - FI ¤I 01/28/2005 Page 1 <>i 2 C V I
I ~ I Case 3:00-cv-01133-PCD Document 47 I 9
I ,.»· . . I
. `E I
I F ILE D 1&SCOUR
· < `E’IIII` I£II..E`__7IO£·‘7.»¤
UNITED STATES COURT OIIIIIAHPEKBISID II= -, JAN 2 U NUS T; I
FOR THE SECOND CGIECUIT Ia! I Ip I
. . DISTRICT CDU °‘°’*~II_ .. I · .@"
NEW HAVEN. cr I ‘°<°c¤I€§E§I:§`E`u~*
RICHARD PARMANAND, ; ` . .
Plaintiff-AppeIlee—Cr0ss Appellant : DOCKET NO. 03-9073 g CI-
: _ DOCKET NO. 03-9333 .
VS. I 00 —0~I~I Isis I
I = be rs.; e I3 I
CAPEWELL COMPONENTS, LLC : I
Defendant—Appellant-Cross Appellant : January 12, 2005 I I I
I
I
I
STIPULATION WITHDRAWING APPEALS FROM ACTIVE CONSIDERATION I
- WITHOUT PREJUDICE, WITH LEAVE TO REACTIVATE I I
I
The undersigned counsel for the parties stipulate that the above—captioned appeals are I
I
hereby withdrawn from active consideration from the Court, such withdrawal to be without
prejudice to a reactivation of the appeals by appellant’s counsel or cross—appellant’s counsel so
notifying the Clerk of this Court in writing by thirty (30) days after the Supreme Court I
I
decision in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Banks, 124 S. Ct. 1712 (Docket No. 03-892,
!
March 29, 2004), or April 15, 2005, whichever occurs sooner. If not reactivated, the appeals I
shall be deemed withdrawn with prejudice. I
I
I
I
I
W 0*% `I I
A ,. •|.¢.i
MII! B- n 4
Q I ""’v7·w" I
.;-.3-Elm) 4- . I
I I .·' I I II. · I
·;j2`;? .‘.·?I=2··jIFi.iIC· I I lo I 05/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

\ I 1 - U { I
· , ·* ·· " __ at I I
I- “ Case 3:00-ov-01133-PCD Document 47 Fnled O1/28/2005 Page 2 of 2 E
Withdrawal of theappeals from active consideration shall not operate as a dismissal of
the appeals under FRAP 42(b). _
t-- ' I
5 I
Qaizggi , Q I
Alan E. Lieberman e F. Mu y A . .
Attorney for Defenda11t—Appellant Attorney for Plaintiff—Appellee e ·
-Cross Appellee -Cross Appellant
Shipman & Goodwin LLP Livingston, Adler, Pulda, Meiklejohn
One Constitution Plaza. & Kelly, P.C.
_ Hartford, CT 06103-1919 557 Prospect Avenue I
(860) 251-5000 I Hartford, CT 06105-2922
(860) 233-9821
Dated: I
I
I
so oRDaRED; eijas/as
` ron THE count
Roseann B. MacKechnie, Clerk of Court
'
Frank J. Scar li, Staff Counsel {
I I
I
391521 v.01
I
I
I

I