Free USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

..,. n_D-..-.- -».. ——»—~— —=
l
Case 3:00-cv-01115-PCD Document 80 Filed 08/10/2005 __Ea e 1 of 1 i
P _ t; · A ‘ W .
MAN DATE D- »
A ` . 97 Civ. 2601 .
A Dors . sa-
ttl 1...hD 1
. p United States Court of Appeals
T A . - FOR THE .
:,1 U SECOND CIRCUIT Z|]l]5 AUG l U P l· 35
_ At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals QCQQRT Q
` 1 Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, o ey quafe, ;
_ _ in the City of New York, on the 11th Day of July, Two thousand and five, l
‘ “ . Present: _ . _
A Hon. John M. Walker, Jr., A“"‘l"” " . ,
_. _, ` Chief Judge, - - _ l
_ ‘ I-Ion. Dennis Jacobs, . és S A _ ‘
_ Hon. José A. Cabranes, 11 'M5 p
.ii- ; p { . Circuit Judges. ` M., 3. _ p i--
1 _ Suzanne M. Searles, '
A Plaintiff—AppeI1ant,
A i l
IA- ` A v. _ 05-1226-cv
A if a West Hartford Board of Education, _ . _ p . l
A A " ` A ` Defendant-Appe1lee._ _1 l
p Appellant, pro se, appeals the district court's denial of her motion for relief under Federal Rule of l
i Civil Procedure 60(b) and to-change venue. Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED that the appeal ’
. A E is dismissed because it lacks an arguable basis in fact or law. See 28 U.S.C. § 19l5(e);Neitzke v. '
2 Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (19-89). .
nl; In addition, Appellant is reminded that, by order entered in Searles v. Relic, No. 04-0551, on April E
A A 7, 2005, Appellant i-s prohibited from filing any further motions, appeals, or other papers in this _
Court "with respect to the facts, claims, or issues underlying the [appeal docketed under 04-0551]
or the prior appeals docketed under 92-7912, 98-9133, and 01-7007" without first obtaining leave p
. of this Court. A
. _ l
a Fon rua cousri
p A TRUE COPY Roseann MacKechnie lerk
Roseann B. MacKechn:le, CLERK g — 5 Q é
A
r DEPUTY CLERK _ _ ` _
T A , , , ` A l
iAA_ sacruw -_ AUG -5 7-005 {
- - "' Issusn AS MANDATE . ` "' g
I
l
l
”i i*i Ei ;¤ge‘*.··# --=. i J;.-{-J av ..=. r.-ai :