Free Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

‘ ~ ·~ t 2 we :g»<.>< · E?
;.,M_,, __j:_;__,:-. , ·’i"~‘·»;."Y`}$,’;;,£§§»’jj 5 ·‘» ‘·_: 3·fy·*_;;V;. 3, ; .-: . - .__. _‘; . , :4-*., · _. »_j · ._ .,a_ __ .__. V _ __ _ _ _ ·—-—--
;*5;7iE.?§.`i>§i¤3;;.:.Qiib,......¤»;¢-»- '‘‘` · `* T TV¢:§·i;;;#;E;.;;;,5-gaj'_;;>i';;$;·;;:~;*:g;-;;—2.&3r’,...,..,.·‘—"~**»..·*~.....-->¢£—i;;a:.—:;*:~.:££¤.¤.1s;;x.E:;2-i‘.,;;;<;.:;.z;-g$3;2.Q.;t;1:;:;:E;H.a:2;;;:£i;$;$$,:»;::— “·Yg,g _ ·¢ ·• ".;§;_: ~ _
E
‘ H
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT qq; gjf· i
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT l ¥‘·~`f
R01.AND cocxmrro, ; Si? E-J :· QZ- i H {
- Plaintiff, : _ _ is
v. : Docket No. SiOOcv564(JBA)
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP., : a
* PRATT & WHITNEY DIVISION, : ;
I Defendant. :
J U D G M E N T I
This matter came on for a bench trial held January 20, 21 »
and 22, 2004 before the undersigned, and —
T 4
On September 30, 2004, after review of the evidence, the ;
I
Court issued its Memorandum of Opinion and Order that judgment
enter in favor of defendant United Technologies Corporation,
Pratt & Whitney Division, ,
_ Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that `
judgment enter in favor of the defendant and against the
D ’ i
plaintiff. E
I
, Dated at New Haven, Connecticut this 30th day of Q
Q September, 2004. .
C IT IS SO ORDERED.
` I
` r" 0 A xi / r
ig Jaget Bond Arterton, U.S.D.J.
E
v_f_f_f_ T*—`·—~—e+ll ···

_*i%i`a—* “"`v—Y—-ei;;oe
-