Free Motion in Limine - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3 OO-cv-00564-JBA Document 109 Filed 12/O3/2003 Page 1 of 3 I
I _ I
I I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I
ROLAN D COCKFIELD, : CIVIL ACTIO NO. I
Plaintiff, I I
VS. 2
: 3:00 CV 564 (J A)
UNITEID TECHNOLOGIES CORP., 1
PRATT & WHITNEY DIVISION 2 I
Defendant. DECEMBER 3, 2003 `
DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO
EXCLUDE TESTIMONY BY SHEILA WIKN K
I ’I he defendant, Pratt & Whitney, a division of United Teclmologi s Corporation, ("Pratt"), I
I respectfI4lly moves this Court to exclude any and all testimony and evide ce from Plaintiff’ s _
I proposeIl witness Sheila Wiknik. The Plaintiff has indicated that Ms. Wi ik will testify as to I
Edith Vt ilcnik’s medical condition. Such testimony should be excluded 0 the basis that it is not
I relevant to these proceedings and has no bearing whatsoever on Pratt’s st te of mind, the ultimate
I I
. - I
I issue toIbe tried in this matter. In addition, Pratt seeks to exclude such te timony as it is I
cumulative and will result in a waste of the court’s time and resources. S e Fed. R. Evid. 402, I
I 403. I
I
I
I I I
ORAL IARGUMENT REQUESTED I Z .,.,_ j
I TESTIIVIONY NOT REQUIRED f-I ·‘
"*· I
I 5 I
I F·$i'@ · ·I·· I
no I
I a II II I
___ __ I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I


I
I
Case 3 00-cv-00564-JBA Document 109 Filed 12/03/2003 Page 2 of 3
I I
}Ntccordingly, Pratt seeks a ruling prior to trial excluding any and a l testimony or evidence I
by SheilNa. Wiknik regarding Edith Wiknik’s medical condition. In suppo of this Motion, Pratt
respectfully submits the accompanying memorandum of law.
DEFENDANT, mana racnuotocias
coma, Pmrr 33 wm NEY Division
Aim z3km0m( t04201) ;
Daniel A. Schwa z (ct 15823) N
Day, Berry & Ho ard LLP N
CityPlace I
Hartford, CT 061 3-3499
(860) 275-0100 I
(860) 273-0343 ( X) I
[email protected]
Its Attorneys E
I
N I

N I
I
I
N N
I I

I
I
I

I
Case 3 OO-cv-00564-JBA Document 109 Filed 12/O3/2003 Page 3 of 3 I
I I
I E I
CERTIFICATE or siznvrcs
T HIS IS TO CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing Motion In Li ine to exclude testimony
by Sheil Wiknik was sent via iirst—class mail, postage prepaid, on this d e to: I
I
Charles IG. Parks, Jr., Esq. I
Parks &IAssociates I
160 For Stamford, CT 06901 . — I
_ .__ ;- * I
Daniel ·- . Schwartz ` I
' I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
I
-3- I
I
l
‘ I