Free Memorandum in Support of Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 66.9 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 22, 2003
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 506 Words, 2,964 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9482/319.pdf

Download Memorandum in Support of Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 66.9 kB)


Preview Memorandum in Support of Motion - District Court of Connecticut
M- t.»——..—_...m..—_.3..._.a,...--..d,_.-.n,“.r.- ,..n.t-.Jf._;;.I..,L_-._ __i
Case 3:00-cv-00835-CFD Document 319 Fi|ed[1 /19/2003 Page 1 0f 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT C iu T U ? [ L_ 5 Q -
DISTRICT OF CONNECTIC T
I may DE
I T U St ms t
1 2 . R T
f . , HAR TFURD. ct

t INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B.
l Plaintiff C VIL ACÂ¥TION NO. l
Y l3: 0CV83_ (CFD) l
i ` v. l I
MOSTAFA REYAD AND WAFA REYAD I
Defendants l .
DAT : DECEMBER 18, 2003
DEFENDANT MOSTAFA REYAD’S MEMORANDUl OF _ A IN SU 'PORT l
or MOTION T0 GRANT MOTION T0 msivnss A @@511 Mo 1oN IN ,
LIMINE I I
This is the Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant l\/los afa Reyad’s motion to
Grant Defendant Mostafa Reyad’s motion to Dismiss dated De ember 3, 2003 (Doc #
311); and to Grant Defenda;nt’s Mostafa Reyad’s second moiio in limihe dated
November 24, 2003 (Doc # 308). Plaintiff’ s consolidated opbo ition to lQ)efendants’ pre- I
trial motions dated December 15, 2003 (Doc # 3 I6) is a mere Tpposition, missing the I
legal memorandum, mandated by Comt. D. L. Rule 9 (a). Plaintiff admits that Plaintiffs I
consolidated opposition does not include the memorandum, intiff stated p. 3-4
"Plaintiff requests that it be permitted to file legal memorand in opposition to
Defendants’ motion twenty—one days following the Court’s det rminatidn that it deems
i I
1 l
nn-.--.. l .~.·. _ I _____
n-- l p! l p! "__ ‘__ ‘ ig ---.._____
l +! l-- l l-- ` Y! Y! ‘__ · - - . . _ _ ___-

l l I l ` an-_—;W”"`
_ . Case 3:00-cv-00835-CFD Document 319 Fi|edi1 /19/2003 Page 2 of 3
l
such a response necessary? Plaintiff’s failure to tile a memcpr dum is ia. good cause to
Grant this motion. E
i
Plaintiff is in contempt of this Court’s Order dated Septembizr 2, 2003l(Doc # 299). This
Court Ordered the parties to file "Anticipated Evidentiary Pic lcms”. Pilaintiff failed to
file legal memorandum, is unacceptable tactics to avoid the te onse mandated by the
Rules, and this Court’s Order. This Court should annotmce tiha P1aintifl` in default i
pursuant to F ed. R. Civ. P. Rule 55 (b) (2), and Order a Judém nt Dismlissing Plaintiff’s N
Entire Complaint as a matter of law. I
i Q
2 P

, ..._..-.. .. . ,_é.ii_... ._i.;..r....,.. ___.._....i..ii..,_,;;_.;...J.,nn,,_ 1,,....-..;. ` ' ,._____;___I
Case 3:00-cv-00835-CFD Document 319 Fi|ed112/19/ 003 Page 3 of 3 p

The Defendant 1 1
Mostafa Reyad Q
/ , 1
BY: LJ,} & mu *
I os . 2a··r*r;va 1
2077 Center Ave # 22D
Fort Lee, NJ 07024
Day Phone 203-325-4100
Home Phone 201-585-0562
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1
This is to certify that the undersigned mailed on the captioned date true and correct 1
copy to Attorney David Schaefer at 271 Whitney Ave, New-Haven, CT 06511 and hand
delivered to Wafa Reyad.
Mostaf Rey 1
1
1
3 1