Free Response - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 111.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 479 Words, 3,063 Characters
Page Size: 614.4 x 790.8 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9481/98-4.pdf

Download Response - District Court of Connecticut ( 111.0 kB)


Preview Response - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:00-cv—00834-SRU Document 98-4 Filed 02/28/2005 Page1 0f2
EXHIBIT 3

Case 3:00-cv—00834-SR ·
U Document 98-4 Filed 02/28/2005 Page 2 of 2 —
`Total productive fabrication hours during the period
from September 1, 1996 through August 31, 2000: T- (_
Hours during Hscal years 1997 though 2000 178,482
Plus hours from September 1, 1996 through December 31, 1996 - note 3 14,003
Less hours from September 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000 — note 4 {_ (14,271)
Productive fab hours from September 1, 1996 to August 31, 2000 178,214
Total hours during White Oak outside storage period note 2 _jQL346
Total hours subject to business interruption by White Oak 70,868
Jobs considered in fabrication time study: 1
Greater than 1,000 hoursof planned fabrication 36,554
, Less than 1,000 hours of planned fabrication ___ 4,62§_> t
Total hours in jobs considered in fabrication time study 41,182
Fabrication hours in jobs not considered in time study 29,686 t
inefficiency rate ~- jobs with less than 1,000 planned fabrication hours- note 1 _ 65.40% ,
Efhcient fabrication hours in jobs not considered in time study ___j_7L9_4§_
inefficient fabrication hours in jobs
not considered in time study 11,738 t
Notes to Schedule: _ A
1 -- Jobs not included in the time study would generally have less than 1,000 hours of planned fabrication; therefore, the inefficiency rate forjobs with less than _
1,000 hours of planned fabrication should be applied to fabrication hours expended on jobs not cosidered in the time study,
2 - l/\/hite Oak was stored outside the fabrication shop from January, 1997 through March, 1998 during the production ofjob A6150 (ADL) and from November, 1999 S
through July, 2000; therefore, all fab hours for these two periods in which White Oak was stored outside of the fab shop will be excluded. Those hours are t
summarized as follows: T
Year ended December, 1 997 57,788 i
MTD January, 1998 3,602 , Y
MTD February, 1998 3,969 ;
MTD March. 1998 __ 2,566 {
Total hours -- Jan 1, 1997 through Mar 31, 1998 __ 67,925_ ` ‘
Period from Nov 1, 1999 through Aug 31 , 2000: Q
MTD November, 1999 3,553 Q
MT`D December, 1999 3,774 §
Period from Jan 1, 2000 through Aug 31, 2000: ,
YTD December, 2000 46,365
r MTD September, 2000 (3,287) S
MTD October, 2000 (3,384) T
MTD November, 2000 (4,069) l
MTD December, 2000 __ (3,531)_
Total from Jan 1, 2000 through Aug 31, 2000 ___32,094 V A
Total from Nov 1, 1999 through Aug 31, 2000 _ 39,421
` `Total hours to exclude 107,346 I
3 - Productive fabrication hours for the period from Sept 1, 1996 through Dec 31, 1996 were derived from Steward management reports as follows:
YTD December 31, 1996 41,082 `
· YTD August 31, 1996 __(27,079) 2
Productive fab hours -» Sep 1 to Dec 31, 1996 14,003 ’
_ 4 -· Productive fabrication hours for the period from Sept 1, 2000 through Dec 31, 2000 were derived from monthly Steward management reports as follows:
September, 2000 3,287
October 3,384 ,
November 4,069
December 3,531 ,
14,271 r
Appendix J