Free Order on Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I ·""""`”" Cas. 3:00-cv—OO339-RNC Document 127 Filed O3/O2/2006 Paget 0f1
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT .' I I
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT , I- I .
I l 4 I _.
I THOMAS O'CONNOR, , 5 NO.: 3:O0CV339 (RNC)%j{ n
I Plaintiff : .·
I LYNNE B. PIERSON. ELLEN C. I
I HEALY. CHRISTOPHER A. DUMAS, :
Y _ PATRICIA M. STRONG, CHRISTINE : I
I Q T. FORTUNATO, DONNA H. HEMMANN, 2
- I6 ,5 STACEY HODGES, JOHN F. MORRIS, : I
I E 6 FREDERICK E. PETRELLI, JR., 2 =
0 -I U5 PENNY H. STANZIALE, and : I
c C; WETHERSFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION: I
I Defendants : JANUARY 13, 2006
. _ ri" I· I
E §» MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
· »= - ia .._,
r-l ` ’· ·l-I "
H I jg? ‘ Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rule 56 a), the defendants, l. nn B. I
ID I , U . V ,
Fi Q
O `j_- Pierson, Ellen C. Healy, Christopher A. Dumas, Patricia M. Strong, Christine T.
4.1 it '
- I
‘” .:’ fl Fortunato, Donna l—l. Hemmann, Stacey Hodges, John F. Morris, Frederick E. Petrelli, I
.2 I I
fi Penny H. Stanziale, and Wethersfield Board of Education, hereby move this court to I
(U " ‘
g enter summaryjudgment as to the plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint, in its entirety, ’
IJ
gi based on the doctrine of res judicata. I
JJ
U; . As more particularly set forth in the attached memorandum of law, the plaintiff I
S
.§ filed two separate lawsuits in two different jurisdictions based on the same cause of I I
Q action - this lawsuit and a lawsuit in state court. The state court lawsuit has been fully I
gl litigated and a judgment rendered on the merits. The defendants move for summary
$,1 I
0; I
~“·' I
U a I
n
I I
I
l
;Q QE-._ .;____ QJ gh ,__“__II_I____ III I II I