Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

| · *7*- “""`W"`W""""`W"""“"_"“_ "“_M"‘_“"“—‘;"r .
I L ’ \
1 J Q1 “. Cgase 3:00-cv-00327-JCH Document 120 Filed 07/1 6/20 19l€3 1
Cx 1
1 s 1
A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F l L E Q .
1 1 FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT M `
l
1 p Zllllll JUL -8 P Ltzqg
1 lHENRY A KORSZUN; WOJ TEK W. Civil Action No. U S D1 Sm
i BOROWSKl and COMPUCLOZ : 3:00CV327 (JCH) `gg§;g]DG;:·pb11§—F~
CORPORATION O)., " ' ’L '“‘“ 1
Plaintiffs, i /
vs. i .
PUBLIC TECHNOLOGIES l STIPULATION , ORDER, AND 1
MULTIMEDIA, INC.; J.C. PENNEY : PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT A
COMPANY, INC.; MATTEL, INC. 1
land/or BRODERBUND SOFTWARE, :
INC.; and LANDS’ END, INC. *
Defendants. i
A WHEREAS this Action has been remanded to the District Court by Order of the United
States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dated March 26, 2004; and 1
1 WHEREAS the parties have agreed to seek the entry of a Final Judgment allowing the
parties to appeal certain issues that are ripe for appellate review;
WHEREAS the Plaintiffs will therefore not oppose the tiling by Defendants of First 1
Amended Answers and Counterclaims in the Action to narrow the presentation of their
1
counterclaims for appeal; and 1
WHEREAS the Defendants’ will not oppose the filing by Plaintiffs of Replies to 1
Defendants First Amended Counterclaims; and
WHEREAS the parties are submitting said filings herewith; and
WHEREAS the parties have agreed to the dismissal and entry of judgment as to the
1
claims and the counterclaims in this Action, for the purpose of establishing a Final Judgment for 1
i
l
ny-568097 1



` r
i e · i Olase 3:00-cv-00327-JCH Document 120 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 2 of 3 [
l
ithe purposes of appeal consistent with the March 26, 2004 Order and the Federal Circuit’s
decisio1·1in Nystrom v. TREX C0., Inc., 339 F.3d 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2003); `
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: i
"l. The Defendants’ First Amended Answers and Counterclaims, and Plaintiffs’ I
Replies to Defendants Amended Answers and Counterclaims, shall be deemed filed as of the i
Hate hereof
Based on this Court’s Decision of June 10, 2003, summary judgment of non-
infringement was granted, and judgment shall be entered dismissing Plaintiffs’ Complaint with
prejudice and granting judgment in favor of Defendants on Cotmt I of Defendants’ First
Amended Counterclaims.
3. Defendants have stipulated that this Court’s Markman Ruling of August 30, 2002,
and its Ruling on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the same date
removed any genuine issue for trial relating to Count III of Defendants’ First Amended I
Cotmterclaims, and, Defendants having consented, judgment shall be entered dismissing Count
III of Defendants’ First Amended Counterclaims with prejudice for the purposes of appealing
therefrom.
4. All other Amended Counterclaims shall be dismissed without prejudice.
l
1
2
ny-568097 5
_..gt..... ............—....................——·--·-·—---—-——-- *

i i. ° C‘ase 3:00-cv-00327-JCH Document 120 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 3 of 3 1
1 Respectfhlly submitted, [pw I
F 1
it --- Jul", It 1. Ib ID 2*111
te s . McNamara, ¤t01220
S 5 GE STEWARD JOHNSTON & C[]1_j[?`1"
986 Bedford Street RE? 31,1 12 ii PU 11 CL11-Z1 1
Stamford, Connecticut 06905-5619 1
, Phone: (203) 324-6155 1
1
1 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
-——- ’ M 1
U-1;% ·?,£?9~/ /Za,-Z@1;;·_? · 1
D James Hough `
Matthew M. D’Amore (ct18982) ` .
Morrison & Foerster LLP
1290 Avenue of the Americas 1
New York, New York 10104-0012 1
Phone: (212) 468-8000 1
William H. Bright, Esq.
1 MCCRYLCI & English, LLP
CityPlace 1, 185 Asylum Street
Hartford, CT_ 06103
Phone: (860) 275-6767 l
1
1 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
so oRr>ERED; f 1
1
&‘$209¢ , l
ate ed States District Judge 1
1
1
3 1
ny-5 68097 S