Free Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

___l,_ ..... .. .. ,..... . ....“.. ....--......_....-...~-------—»—~··»------——-—-—-—#————————- *“‘"—
. l
Case 3:00-cr-00183-AWT Document 250 Filed 03/21/2005 ·
, ‘ , C-) A C)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :No. 3;00CR183(A
vs. Y = ` i
ALEXEY V. IVAN OV , : JANUARY 7, 2003 I
MOTION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO OBTAIN SERVICES OF IMMIGRATION
AQTTORNEY > J `
Defendant hereby moves the Court, in accordance with certain provisions of the Criminal
Justice Act, to authorize the Defendant to obtain the services of an attorney who is specialized in
immigration matters, and specifically to approve reimbursement for the necessary expenses so long
as they are documented and reasonable in accordance with CJA procedures. i
Defendant represents that the services are necessary for the reasons that follow.
In November of 2002, at a time when the Defendant was pressing a Motion seeking his
release on conditions, the Government filed a detainer relating to immigration questions which might
be raised. No detainer had existed before; and, on information and belief absent the Def`endant’s
desire to be released on conditions following his guilty plea in August of 2002 and prior to his
sentencing, it is believed that no detainer would have been tiled.
The Defendant is currently incarcerated at Fort Dix, New Jersey. His ultimate release date
is May 5, 2004. Defendant has been told that, absent the existing detainer, he would have been
· I il is
eligible to be placed in a hallway house in Hartford on or about December 3 l, 2003. " `" " _
n J iw · ~ il
In addition, it is counsel’s understanding that, until and unless the detainer is removed, the
J `V ir;
Detendanfs release is substantially in jeopardy. The undersigned have worked very hard within the I
DENIED, as moot.
it is so ordered. ‘
t l
i
r nv uu Vin I Ilulllpsung U¤S¤D'J· I
A namcrttct We J"' }
._ l if _ J _ J _ J _ J _
I J N C _ C _ C _ J _ J

I
Case 3:00-cr-O018ZE—A}/VT Document 250 Filed 03/2152005 Page 2 of 3 Q
limitations of their understanding of immigration law to effect a removal of the detainer; but, having
exhausted all avenues they are aware oi they wish the Court to authorize the appointment as
described above. l
. Attorney Furniss has spoken to Attorney William J. Anastasi, who has helped informally in
this matter heretofore and who is generally rather familiar with it; Attorney Anastasi is not on the CJ A
panel but it is requested that the Court approve reasonable expenses which at this time are not
expected to exceed $5,000.00 in order that Defendant may obtain his services.
DEFENDANT
ALEXEY V VANOV
i B16 c ~ [
C. omas Furnis
Fed Bar #ct00028
. Furniss & Quinn, P.C.
i 248 Hudson Street
Hartford, CT 06106
A (860)527—2245
Fax; (860)24l-1032
. /?4{ M¢1>»··¤[email protected]£e/LY"
Mor n Paul Rueckert B
. Fed Bar #ctl9838
Shipman & Goodwin
One Landmark Square
Stamford, CT 06901
S (203) 324-8112
A 2

Case 3:00-cr-00183-AWT Document 250 Filed 03/21/2005 Page 3 of 3
. O O
1
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that a copy ofthe foregoing was mailed on this 7"‘ day of January, 2004 to:
i Hon. Alvin W. Thompson
1 United States District Judge
450 Main Street
Hartford, CT 06103
Mark Califano 1
1 Assistant U.S. Attorney
915 Lafayette Blvd
Bridgeport, CT 06604
Shawn J. Chen l
y Assistant U. S. Attorney
1 157 Church Street
New Haven, CT 06510 1
1 1
1 Alexey V. Ivanov #3 0491-086 l
1 Fort Dix FCI
Unit 5852
. P.O. Box 38
Fort Dix, NJ 08640 I
l Morgan Paul Rueckert V
1 Shipman & Goodwin
1 One Landmark Square
Stamford, CT 06901
Martha Newberry
U.S. Probation Officer
i 450 Main Street
Hartford, CT 06103 ,
1 . Thomas Furnis , Esq. {
1
1
3 1