Free USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

m . 1 Il l
e t * ¢ · d 10/25/2006 Paget UCF
i g Case 8:OO—cr—OOO69-Alj|N Document 248 FIIG
` UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
-.A‘: ‘ 2 ron me SECGNI) ctlggmni _ ,
=·A ip rnuncoon Msnsmtt U.s.,¤couiz:r 1—1ousE;.. ` _ ___F_
; 40 sores s mms . -
; NEW Yo1u =-; fr ,, . , z
‘i eg Eat Uel 25 1;* l2= I OO U {acl
_ Ros ann B. MacKechnie - ,: _\
if e crisnx `f _i . _ ._ ,1: kiC\i@¢-{
eg? [hi; i. ·:_`=.»’;L;.i~
5:%; §» Q i' E L I
_;Date: 1 0/ l O/06 it ,
QiDocket Number: 06-2374-izr ,
Z?Sh0rt Title: USA v. Cox
HEDC Docket Number: 00-cr-69 `
EDC: CONNECTICUT (NEW HAVEN) ·
:i§I)C Judge: Honorable Alan Nevas `
r
[ Q}
J At a stated term of the States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Daniel Patrick
l hiloynihan United States Couithniuse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on the 10th day of
QCTOBER, two thousand six. . `
Clinton Cox, J __ _____ _
if i=namrarr.Appenee. _l
A scheduling order in accorilance with the Revised Second Circuit Plan to Expedire the Processing of
Criminal Appeals having been eritered therein, requiring the record on appeal, the appellants brief and the
joint appendix to be tiled on or before the dates stated on the scheduling order, and also providing that in
the event of default by the appellant the appeal shall be dismissed forthwith, and it appearing that the appellant
so defaulted, .
li Upon consideration ofthe appeal defendant~appellant, ClintongCox, it is ORDERED that the appeal be,
it hereby is DISMISSED. Any motions pending prior to the entry of this order of dismissal are deemed
Moor. i
cf This order may not be used the basis for terminating the defendant-appellant`s release pending appeal
until 30 days have elapsed fromlthe date of the order.
fil? li For the Court,
gg Ex ,,.,_.r F, W, Roseann hnie, Clerk
* Ut t 3
_; ~__- Ros Bl .2-J-1 ::2 ;. t .’.. , 8 `
‘:=- j i
, _ g V. IC mo
___p4g“______M ww Deputy Clerk