Free USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

..,. n_D-..-.- ».. ——»—~— —=
l
Case 2:90-cv-00626-PCD Document 175 Filed 08/10/2005 ____Pa e 1 of 1 i
P _ L · r ‘ W .
MAN DATE D- »
C ` . 97 Civ. 2601 .
· Dors . m-
tfltao i
. p United States Court of Appeals
F V . - FOR THE .
:,1 U SECOND CIRCUIT Z|]l]5 AUG l il P I- 35
_ At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals QCQQRT Q
` 1 Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, o ey quafe, ;
_ _ in the City of New York, on the 11th Day of July, Two thousand and five, l
‘ “ . Present: _ . _
e Hon. John M. Walker, Jr., “""`” " . ,
, _, ` Chief Judge, - - _ i
_ ‘ I-Ion. Dennis Jacobs, . $5 S A ‘
_ Hon. José A. Cabranes, 11 {ms p
.li- ; p { . Circuit Judges. ` M., 5. _ p i- r
A _ Suzanne M. Searles, '
l Plaintiff—AppeI1ant,
A i l
I- ` ·· v. _ 05-1226-cv
C if a West Hartford Board of Education, _ . _ p . .
A a ” ` A ` Defendant-Appe1lee._ _A l
p Appellant, pro se, appeals the district eourt's denial of her motion for relief under Federal Rule of l
i Civil Procedure 60(b) and tochange venue. Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED that the appeal ’
. A E is dismissed because it lacks an arguable basis in fact or law. See 28 U.S.C. § 19l5(e);Neirz/ce v. '
2 Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (19-89). .
I; In addition, Appellant is reminded that, by order entered in Searles v. Relic, No. 04-0551, on April E
A · 7, 2005, Appellant is prohibited from filing any further motions, appeals, or other papers in this _
Court "with respect to the facts, claims, or issues underlying the [appeal docketed under 04-0551]
or the prior appeals docketed under 92-7912, 98—9133, and Ol-7007" without first obtaining leave p
. of this Court. ‘
. _ l
A Fon rue cover;
p A TRUE COPY Roseann MacKechnie lerk
" . MacKechn:le CLERK —
Roseann B r QA/U p
/
A DEPUTY CLERK _ _ ` _
T ‘ , , , ` A l
lee_ sscruw -_ _ AUG -5 7-005 {
- A ISSUED as MANDATE . ` "' g
. I
l
l
”i i*i *2* ;#ia*‘*.·‘* ·-=. # Isa-.? av ..=. r.-i st. 3.--ze. --—..--.·- »