Free Motion for Writ of Mandamus - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

\’ Case 3:03-cv-00665-MRK Document 49 Filed 1 1/O1/2005 Page 1 of 4 1
1
STATSES DISTRICT COURT
I .
S R CT F CONNECTICUT mr] Nm · \ P ry: 20;
, .~;_- ·a·· =‘: CUUR
U.$R1€\1\]“1_j1jQ\j5i-—l. CI
TERRENCE HENDERSON, : Case N0. 3:03CV665 {MRK) y
VS. :
THE TOWN OF GREENWICH : NOVEMBER , 2005
1
WRIT OF MANDAMUS ' 1
(I) THE RELIEF SOUGHT:
I request judgement be granted as a matter of law, with the damages to be
determined by an impartial and unprej udiced jury. I requested Twenty Million dollars in
compensation, and Twenty Million dollars in punitive damages.
(II) THE ISSUES PRESENTED:
Summary Judgement Rule 56 Counsel and Pro Se Parties are further notified that 1
they are required to comply with requirements relating to Motions For Summary Judgment as set
forth in FED. R. CIV. P.56 and D.CONN. L. GIV. R, 56. A party may move for Summary
Judgment when that party believes there is no genuine issue of material fact requiring trial and
the party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The Motion may be directed toward all or
part of a claim or defense and it may be made on the basis ofthe pleadings or other portions of
the Record in the case or it may be supported by Aflidavits and other material outside the 1
pleadings.
1
1
1




-—` .F Case 3:03-cv-00665-MRK Document 49 Filed 11/O1/2005 Page 2 of 4
When a party seeking Summary Judgment (The "l\/loving Party") files a supporting
Affidavit, the party opposing Summary Judgment must file an Affidavit, or other Documentary l
Evidence, contradicting the moving party’s submissions to Demonstrate that there are factual
l
issues requiring a trial. Facts asserted inthe Aftidavit(s) of the moving party will be taken as
true if not controverted by Counter-Affidavits or other documentary evidence.
Local Civil Rule 56(a) requires the party seeking summary judgment to file a document
entitled "Local Rule 56(a)l statement," which sets forth in separately numbered paragraphs a
concise statement of each material fact as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine
issue to be tried. The material facts set forth in this statement shall be deemed admitted unless
controverted by the ‘“Local Rule 56(a)2 Statement" required to be served by the opposing party.
The paragraphs in the 56(a)2 statement shall correspond to the paragraphs in the 56(a)l
I
Statement and shall state whether the facts asserted by the moving party are admitted or denied.
The Local Rule 56(a)2 Statement must also include in a separate section a list of each issue of
material fact as to which it is contended there is a genuine issue to be tried. I
(lll) THE FACTS NECESSARY TO UNDERSTAND THE ISSUE PRESENTED BY
THE PETITION; E
1 can only present evidence that can and will prove my case beyond a reasonable
doubt. The TOWN OF GREENWICH never opposed my Motion For Summary Judgement.
They never admitted or denied the fact’s that were presented. Judge Kravitz denied my motion
without prejudice. l appealed this decision to the Appellate Court and the Court ruled they had p
no jurisdiction over the case because there was no final decision rendered. lf I can not prove any
claims asserted, then it would be in the best interest of the Court to dispose of my lawsuit in it’s
l


n
’,_. Case 3:03-cv-00665-MRK Document 49 Filed 11/O1/2005 Page 3 of 4 `
entirety. Relative Stems; is servirig no purpose. j
(IV) T`l·lE REASONS `\Vl.lY THE WRTT SHOULD ISSUE:
The Writ should issue beeeuse this metter could not be resolved et the l
Compensation Hearing. There lr: no other resolution. The matter has to be resolved through e. ’
Writ of Mandemus. 1 ern not dealing with the principles. of low, 1 em dealing with personal
feeling?. l
Mr. Terrence Iiendereorx, Pro Se l
5360 Broadway
Apt. 7C i
Bronx, New York 10463
icwe) HQ25 rl we S l
Terrence Henderson, Pro Se
D¤t¤·r_E;Q§___a
l

l
l
l
l
l
l
i
l
I

1* Case 3:03-cv-00665-MRK Document 49 Filed 11/O1/2005 Page 4 of 4 i
1
x.’1EKIFE1.QAT!L).?i_
This is to certify that a copy of thc foregoing has been mailed on the abovecaptioncd date
to all counsel and pro se parties of record:
Xfaioric Memo, Esq, Raymond . Riga; Esq.
Town of Grccnwic-h. Gilbtidc & Rigat
101 Ficzld Point Rd. 23 EastMai11S1reot `
PLO. Box 2540 Cliimon, CT (36413
-G1·ecnwio};1. CT 0633632540
1
‘I`o:·re12co Ho dersim _
[o( 1 fos 1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1 1
1
1