Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

|"`"T"
I · Case 3:03-cv-OO632—§U Document 14 Fnled 10/22/2003 Id ad;
I P I *7 4
.
I "& {MII I¢~-F-·‘
I In- .1 Ir:. I3
I 2803 UCI I b I3 I2r LI I
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT if I [ I - _; "
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I
I WILLIAM SCOTT : CASE NO. 303CV632(SRU) \I°I‘— `
U Plaintiff :
I vs. ¤
I UNITED NATURAL FOODS INC. OCTOBER [5 2003 I
I Defendant : I
I 3;;;,12; gets) among; QF marins 1=;;.A1;Iumg Mnmmgg
I
I DATE COMPLAINT FILED: April 8, 2003
I DATE OF PLAINTIFF’S APPEARANCE: April 8, 2003; substitute appearance by
- Catherine Sammartino and Andrew Berg on or about July 25, 2003.
I DATE COMPLAINT SERVED: On or about August 20, 2003. I
I DATE OF DEFENDANT’S APPEARANCE: August I2, 2003 I
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 16(b), 26(O, and D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 38, a I
. I I
`\ conference was held on September 5, 2003, and follow up conferences were held on or I
I I cg I about September 23, 2003. The participants were Andrew Houlding for the defendant
L,] BI ea E and Catherine Sammartino for Plaintiff. I
~..__ ZZ ` .
s., I: U2 I
`;`“ §I I. CERTIFICATION I
U Q § A. Undersigned counsel certify that, after consultation with their clients, they I
E e .
wz: ·::= ·
§ § - Q; have discussed the nature and basis of the parties’ claims and defenses and
5 gg Q _ '
U O I U gr .
g E. E IE) 5 any possibilities for achieving a prompt settlement or other resolution of
g Q, jj, Q, {QT?
5 g F; T, ***2 . the case and, in consultation with their clients, have developed the
E =
E H I6 `" ‘“" ' .. ·
>_ ,
E §. E E GS I I
3 .9. ¢¤ :1 G —-.. *‘·—• ;_..> '
nd Q EFS ef UJQ
I
2$;2eaa$se=‘;;£:$h‘S.€€<£t€zeii&aaasgesiaza/LwungLamm:-....,-_ , _ j V ‘ _- · *‘* ‘ ie - ·4-#e*‘=.E:=:- <—-;;·- gg-Te-.; L; _.__
?r?$£¥}.FE3§.%3f$}H‘i€§EEE:i$.€?i§€:§€*:5é@:€¤»}r·a¤¤-s··.»~.-;-·:-e7 V ._ _ _ " __ ` EF ’: T `** · ‘ %$E`*?i€>*"