Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

{ ij,. O3-cv-0105@VC Document 86 Filed 01/26UO6 Paget oft ' l
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT r l I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ij ’é°` Qf?Y_,' gi.;
5. T lf
DOLORES FONSECA, ET AL :. _ tj-; gf;
I Plaintiffs, Z c 0. 3I:I)3(iV1055 (AVC),
vs. : .
‘ JASON ALTERIO, ET AL · I
I Defendants ’ . JANUARY 23, 2006 4
I · MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT I
A I Pursuant to Local.Rule 7(b)(2), the_Defe,ndants request an extension of time
6 ·» to reply to the PIaintiffs’ Response to Summary Judgment dated January 13, 2006.
i I é 3; Counsel for the Defendants request this extension because she intends to file
. U] 44 .1 A
( I affidavits addressing the documents that Plaintiffs attached to the reply and, despite
l ”—?’?`.; ""· ...r . "· l
yu efforts to complete, counsel has been unable to finalize and submit the response
* will Q? ;;.:4
6 I because the individuals have not been available to complete the affidavits..
¤¤‘ l ei? V
5, S 4 ` I" 4 I ln accordance with Rule 7(b)(3), counsel for the Plaintiff and co-Defendant
rx 4 ’ `QJ I 4
O ;.¢·—~—~i 4; 4 were contacted to determine their position. Attorney Polan indicated there is no
v` r—I ` `LJ
§ “° l objection, and counsel for co—Defendant was not available and a message waslelt.
N — I
t . 4 He has not4contacted4 counsel regardinghis position. 44 4, _ 4 .4 _ 4
rz I A . , _ _ _,_, 4 J
Q 4 I
IU O
*1 U)
BIVIFOGOOQS I 44 4 1 d