Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

_ _ Case 3:03-cv—OO968-Wig Bocumenf Erica
l
¢~·*:"""""“-Y, O •
I
L? 3 <.. Y Vg. gkm is X /·l-it as <..-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I
THOMAS MATYASOVSZKY, on behalf of : _! ,2
himself and all other persons similarly situated, : CIVIL ACTION NO. ·} ,.1 fi
Plaintiffs, : j I
: 3 :03-CV-968 (RNC) / I
V. : ‘ l
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF I
BRIDGEPORT, COLLIN VICE, individually and :
in her capacity as Executive Director of the Housing:
Authority ofthe City of Bridgeport, and J ONAS : NOVEMBER 17, 2003
DE GUZMAN, individually and in his capacity as : . -
Special Assistant to the Executive Director of the : ..... “ ii I
Housing Authority of the City of Bridgeport, 2 -` ;- gl g
5 Defendants. : *< " ‘
ei I Y I
Q _ PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME “`* i` ’>=" 5
(U :>,, Z'Q_ •\;2 I
'U ct J
(Q EQ Plaintiff Thomas Matyasovszky moves this Court to extend by six weekszill
· 4.>
$1 —§ deadlines in the Rule 26(f) Report approved by the Court on August 26, 2003. The
tg 2 parties have agreed to this extension because they find it unlikely that they will be able to
is i.>
E E meet the originally proposed deadlines. A deposition started on November 14, 2003 was E
(9
nd suspended because of a conflict over the interpretation of an asserted privilege. Plaintiff
Q intends to file a Motion to Compel to seek clarification from the Court, but it may not be
¤ 5
N_ possible to obtain this ruling and, if necessary, finish the deposition prior to the original
8 I
M
:> I ` li.
O I l
n W-.? g n 0_-00
+i __ ___ -7 H n - n V rr _ W--MU