Free Motion for Conference - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

l em e"_“——··— ..U.
: Case 3:03-cv—OO944—RNC Document 36 Filed 10/O4/2004 Pagel 0f2 E
9 U0l_l<’.Cl STCATCS D lS`l_l` {QT
{ COUFT lw ’ ‘‘
I ' " JU F) 5:
l Dl5Tl`lCT Op COY7Y`lEQTl@&MEi3TRlC;iW_e,_gg_·-;
` · lf}?. _;-4
J-Oll'Y\€S YYlCl l vs.
l l
Y\/OYWNCL $€Q_l_€Yl’!lC>¤‘3I`C;2Z'S,.;ZOO'~/
pclmelcl 5 lncicl ’
C<3.P pgp mq; HUSbCmCl
VTITC1 Dclflcwcln
Jlwl `l`<>¤¤jIc>P
Hannah

_ ElC1l`T”1T`l E E [IiOTl“OY\ FOP $éT`l_l<‘ZlYl€Y\T Qggpcffmgg,
EQ ©lO_l\’”lTlFC Ks Clfixmq S5 Fmm The Cl€l3cr\0lcmT$ UmTm'·_;
C,l\1\l CLLCJTIOYI gleaming W¤cAT lane <;lcPcrwclcmTé ¤'mpw-¤.pCp1`j l
bremghcql (>¢`*¤xr<¤·<; The plcmxT(Pll` méidlhczll {vn lzewmqlnbn . 3
qf>¤*`5¤¤~·¤l T¤> M: <1<>¤l=rg mer gm adenine €>*` ;;;\i$?{L&’ pk-m"Tl pp lflc»i\d§`Tc;ml"n%l `l`\n<:LT cm Eemlé-*5 S€Tl`l-
QH er`@¤c€. wool 6*. enc ·— lblcll fm l`hl$ Q cl l
c:\<;C,c>r*<;lm lej heheh res ecfell 5 m` exc Cm l
mg Ol gmglemmw COE? l>€l—€°°m€_ `j "`°"’@ `S °°°"l S"€‘<‘
Q€S P€C.
PIQMTI PF1 A
l
ilYY`\€ LEQ YTK-lq`ir‘\|"\Olr\ VDWOSQM
i

)
l llll l l 1 l l l

Case 3:03-cv—OO94 /2004 Page20f2 H
5
I hevebaj c@r`T1`p~j WQT The PE>T`€ @@3 YY\<;¢i'fcd To W6 C‘€P€’V`)C{CJw\TS \%TTc;>r~ncj
oi? v`<2<;c>r~c:I T]/JB ,Z2S[U¤ Dmj OP 5ep`(Embf-r~
QOO Q`], 'QJIBO DQOLT T-]”`\l`§ C.lCl\`VV] TOb€
Tv`v<-1 cmd T0 We be$Tc>F rmj obflffj
D@p@md>c¤Y1Y5 Ifwdibx/(·cI<2c{} CC¤Pc2c.{T¤j/
xgiomnc C©|@TT€ .,€T}O\L ?
Cu/vxcalq SYIGQ ’ R
Cer?} Schwink
pow mc \`\U$bcmcl
l'\jTG¤ Dcimcxvcm
Jim Tux?/`lcr j
_ |—|c{[n<1}’?

{ _ ___ R6 QQTQD ll
\<©~W1\@cn Ay Kaulah Pl§§T£(?PU lj
P1%${§FcmT }C}TTOI`f'\ p€C(€PQl BOX`, mO_QT €;m?pL€;rT;§?Q§;(Pm$Q
MO, Sherman Y>T¥`ff€T - &
|~IcmT YDOPC} C¤¤r\ci·c:Ttc;u`(` HcC‘§;;}i·’0 i
0cs,¢©s·
_ *_ _ ~