Free Order on Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I ._~——~———»_ pj Case 3:03-cv-009m-CFD Document 50 Filed mg/2004 Page 1 of 1 I
I I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT _~ ~ ,j... I
I = ROBERT T. PARKER : CIVIL ACTION NO. pry; ;~-_i Ib .3 ,)_ I
Plaintiff ; I ~ ·I~· · I-- i;.· Sb
‘ V' : /I-{I` 'I ‘~··· rII» ..-W
, I P I `* I G'.
HARTFORD PARKING AUTHORITY : 3:03CV930(CFD) if I/ ""‘“‘ ‘r ‘·
_ and : 5 ,
" MERYTH DEAN WILLIAMS,
. Chairperson, Hartford Parking Authority :
in her official and individual capacity :
In and :
B §` SERAFIN MENDEZ MENDEZ I
~. Q Treasureralglarlford Parking Authority : .
W \ in hisfofficial and individual capacity 2 I
Q Defendants : January 13, 2004 ,
I I
wx . " ' —? I
Q . . PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED
I - - A [COMPLAINT AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT I
wx /\ "" : . .
Q I Q`: The plaintiff, Robert Parker, hereby moves for leave to file his second ‘
Q § ‘ amended complaint in the above matter. The complaint adds facts that the I
Qt:
. plaintiff has discovered since filing this complaint that support a cause of action I
Q3 for breach of Mr. Parker’s rights to due process of law.
t` I I Under Rule 15(a) ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the federal courts `
é' I have adopted a liberal policy for granting amendments to the pleadings. The
*i¤ii;.§’i `= '
? IIE . courts routinely grant parties leave to amend so long as the amendments cause
I I no prejudice to the opposing party or unduly delay the litigation. Foman v, Davis, I
37I U.S. ITB (l962). The amendments proposed here conform to these
standards.
. I
A --- aa. La . `_ y ‘i‘F‘i‘iii·rir ·
ea I --. .--. C- aQQ__ i”i‘F‘F‘i‘i‘r·r·i ~