Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

ii »»m-—
Case 3:03-cv-00929-AWT Document 25 Filed 10/23/2003 Page 1 of 1
l
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT R
NICHOLAS SICINOLFI : DN. 3:03 CV 929 (AWT)A?g;f
Plaintiff, :
v. : .
TOWN OF TRUMBULL, ET AL, : E
I
Defendant. : OCT. l4, 2003
MOTIONIEOR EXTENSION OF TIME R
Plaintiff moves for an extension of time nunc pro tunc until i
Friday, October ll, 2003, to respond to defendant's motion to i
dismiss.
Plaintiff’s counsel has had numerous lengthy matters to
complete, including a summary judgment reply, and could not file
the brief on this motion. This is plaintiff’s first request for
an extension of time. On October 14, 2003, the undersigned
called Atty. Raymond Hassett, one of the counsel for defendants,
to ask whether defendants would object to the motion. Attorney
Hassett said he could not speak to the issue since the matter was E
being handled by his partner, nill Attorney Louis George. The under é
Extension GRANTE`D,- I
to and including Oc+<>¤=·¢r‘r?, eee:. I
It is so ordered. . , _
¥**~ ¥¥» tw, .. . 1f ¤1r_i E
.@’ JOJZJJ 05

13;Qi;iii;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;ii;;Iiii;;;;;;ZIZZZZZ2;;::;::;:;==¤...ii_r_____
‘ I I no timn N _. A, _

i$i_____ `M
ij;;;Iiii;;i;;;;i;i;;1;;;;;;ii;ii;;;;i:;;;;;Z;;:;I2ZZZZZZ;;;:::::;;H*_iii__r___
an- nmnl lllnlvfl .. . ~r.r, ;_ liiiik"*_gk`w—3_`*—T""T“`“—t——~—e—Q;QQQgii;i;ii

r _ g