Free Motion for Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I '
I ‘ ` Case 3:03-cv—OO609f$lU Document 49-2 Filed 1 1/il€OO3 Page 1 of 3 {
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i`_ Y I
. DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT "
I ·~» vii F E Bq I
ROBERT L. BROCKWAY, IR. ; [till} Wl · I
_ E civu, Acr,I1;rgsr.i>to_. Ygj I " I
Plaintrff : 3:03CV00609 (SRU) O·* l F
v. . Q N
YALE UNIVERSITY; JEROME N. FRANK I
LEGAL SERVICES ORGANIZATION OF _
YALE LAW SCHOOL; RICHARD C. LEVIN, : `
President of the University, Official Capacity;
ROBERT A. SOLOMON, Director of JEROME N. :
FRANK LEGAL SERVICES ORGANIZATION
OF YALE LAW SCHOOL, I/O; ANTHONY T. : j
KRONMAN, Dean of Yale Law School, I/O; 5
CARROLL LEE LUCI-IT, Law Professor, ; I
and Attomey at Law, I/O; STEPHEN WIZNER, I
Law Professor, and Attorney at Law, I/O. :
Defendant(s) NOVEMBER 21, 2003 I
MEMORANDUM OF LAWS 4
IN REGARD TO DEMAND FOR ,]U"DGMENT
(c) Demand for Judgment. "A judgment by default shall not be different in kind or
exceed in amount that prayed for in the demand for judgment. Except as to a party I
against whom a judgment is entered by default, every final judgment shall grant the J
relief to which the party in whose favor it is rendered is entitled, even if the party has
not demanded such relief in the party’s pleadings?
(d) Cost; Att0rneys’ Fees. (1) Costs Other that Att0rneys’ Fees. "Exoept when
express provision therefor is made either in a statute of the United States or in these
rules, costs other than attorney’s fees shall be allowed as of course to the prevailing
party unless the court otherwise directs; but costs against the United States, its
~ » A- ;_.. .. .. .. ._ I Onlnlnlllnlnlnl I
A- L.- -» A-A A- .. .. .. _. _O , nlnlnlllnlnln I

{ n \ Case 3:03-cv—OO609@`F}U Document 49-2 Filed 11/{472003 Page 2 of 3
officers, and agencies shall be imposed only to the extent permitted by law. Such
l costs may be taxed by the clerk on one day’s notice. On motion served within 5 days i
l thereafter, the action ofthe clerk may be reviewed by the court." {
i imspscrrurry suamrran,
y y { l
Ro ert L. roc way, Ir. " i
28 Boston Terrace ‘
Guilford, Connecticut 06437 i
(203) 214-0202
!
l
z
l
i
2 l

I I I _,.
3 `I : - -00609 U D t 49-2 Filed 1 1/ 4/ 03 Page 3 of 3
{ Case 3 03 cv ocumen
I BROCKWAY V. YALE UNIVERSITY, ET AL
I USDC, BRIDGEPORT CIVIL ACTION NO.3 :03 CV00609 (SRU)
§ CERTIFICATION '
N This is to cernify that the foregoing PLAIN TIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAWS `
i 1N REGARD TO DEMAND FOR JUDGMENT has been served in person on November
E 21, 2003 to the law office of PATRICK M. NOONAN and BROCK T. DUBIN of
1 DELANEY, ZEMETIS, DONAHUE, DURHAM & NOONAN, PC, ConceptPa1·k-Suite
306, 741 Boston Post Road, Guilford, CT 06437.
// ’ / ' 1
, .44,../,- » _' / A
’ o ert L. Brockwa , Jr. g
i
" E