Free Order on Motion for TRO - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I .,....>,...a..--_.t- ________,,,_,__ __ I
I Case 3:03-cv-00599-CFD Document 53 Filed O3/O4[2004 Page 1 of 2
I C) O I
_ I `“ I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT _.;;;; ,5,
I e Tl I
I BRIDGEPORT and PORT JEFFERSON ; FQIII ZF ‘
I STEAMBOAT COMPANY, et al., 3 4:: I I
Plaintiffs, ; —Y-I-Y-: I,
: tre: QQ W, I
v. : Civil Action No. iw: L.,
: 3:03 CV 599 (CFD) -—~I K
BRIDGEPORT PORT AUTHORITY, :
Defendant. ;
QRDER I
Pending is the plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show
Cause Why Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue [Doc. # 49]. The motion for temporary I
restraining order is DENIED. As to the request for a preliminary injunction, the court hereby I
ORDERS that on March 24, 2004 at 10:00 2\.I&, in Courtroom Two, United States Courthouse
Annex, 450 Main Street, Hartford, Connecticut, the defendants shall show cause why a
I
preliminary injunction should not issue in the above·captioned matter. I
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: I
1. By no later than 5:00 p.m. on March 17, 2004, each party shall tile with the Clerk I
of the Court and shall serve upon other counsel of record the following items:
I
(a) numbered list of proposed findings of fact, including the actual or projected
evidentiary basis for each such finding;
_ (b) a numbered list of proposed conclusions of law, including citations to
authorities in support of each conclusion,
(c) a list of witnesses to be examined by the party at the preliminary injunction
hearing, including a succinct summary of the testimony which each such witness is expected to I
I
I
I
l
I
1
_U—T`”`Ti ‘ ’%—y—y—~———» g- e · · -· eee- = .e 2

I
,. Case 3:03-cv-00599-CFD Document 53 Filed O3/O4/2QBd Page 2 of 2
. I
provide;
(d) a list of the exhibits which the party expects to offer at the preliminary
injunction hearing. This list shall be numbered, to the extent practicable, in the order that the =
exhibits are likely to be offered. i
2. The parties shall meet to discuss their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of ’
law and to stipulate to any proposed findings of fact or conclusions of law to which they are in I
accord. In their respective responses to this Order to Show Cause, the parties shall indicate those
findings of fact and conclusions of law which are stipulated.
3. Service of any of the papers noted above shall be made by in-hand service upon
adversary counsel by the date and time indicated.
It is so ordered. M}
Dated at Hartford, Connecticut, on this _?_ da _ A _ · p
.,____ ....; ; .r . I
CH · TOI·HER F. DRONEY i
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
l
‘ 1
l
` l
l
l

I
I
l