Free Affidavit - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 42.0 kB
Pages: 3
Date: March 4, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 492 Words, 3,114 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22713/85.pdf

Download Affidavit - District Court of Connecticut ( 42.0 kB)


Preview Affidavit - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-00596-JBA

Document 85

Filed 03/04/2004

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT TOM JAMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, V. TRACE APPAREL LLC and J. TRACY GREEN, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 303 CV 0596 (JBA)

MARCH 4, 2004

AFFIDAVIT OF THOMAS J. FINN IN SUPPORT OF MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL

I, Thomas J. Finn, do hereby swear and affirm as follows: 1. I am an attorney with the law firm of Halloran & Sage LLP, attorneys for the

plaintiff, Tom James Company ("Tom James"), in the above-captioned matter. I make this affidavit in connection with Tom James' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion to Compel, dated March 4, 2004 ("Memorandum"). 2. On or about October 22, 2003, the defendants, Trace Apparel LLC and J.

Tracy Green's (collectively "Defendants"), served discovery requests upon Tom James. Tom James timely objected and responded to these discovery requests, and made relevant documents available for Defendants' inspection in accordance with Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00596-JBA

Document 85

Filed 03/04/2004

Page 2 of 3

3.

Defendants took no issue with Tom James' objections and responses to

their discovery requests until counsel for Tom James received correspondence from Peter Olson ("Mr. Olson"), dated December 22, 2003. 4. Tom James has undertaken good faith efforts to resolve Defendants' issues

with Tom James' responses and objections. As a result, the parties have resolved a majority of the discovery issues, including Requests for Production No. 5 and 18. 5. Tom James initially objected to Request for Production No. 5 because Tom

James had previously produced the requested 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan to Defendants. However, during a meet and confer between counsel on January 20, 2004, Tom James agreed to confirm that responsive documents had been produced. 6. Also during the meet and confer of January 20, 2004, Defendants' counsel

agreed to limit Request for Production No. 18 to copies of minutes of meetings in which the Board of Directors set the yearly value of stock. After considering this Request as amended, I informed Mr. Olson via email on February 2, 2004, that Tom James would produce this information. 7. Accordingly, Tom James had agreed to the production of information

responsive to Requests for Production No. 5 and 18 prior to the filing of Defendants' Motion to Compel.

-2­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00596-JBA

Document 85

Filed 03/04/2004

Page 3 of 3

___________________________ Thomas J. Finn

Signed and sworn to before me on this 4th day of March, 2004.

______________________________ Commissioner of the Superior Court

-3­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105