Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 57.8 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 2003
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 511 Words, 3,089 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22713/45.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 57.8 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
5 _ Case 3:03-cv-00595-JBA Document 45 Filed 12/30[2003 Paget of 3 I
O C.) )
I I
I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
TOM JAMES COMPANY, : CIVIL ACTION NO.
: 303 CV 0596 (JBA)
Plaintiff, :
v. Z I
TRACE APPAREL LLC and
J. TRACY GREEN, :
Defendants. DECEMBER 30, 2003
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ON CONSENT
Pursuant t0 Rule 7(b) of the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court I
for the District of Connecticut, the plaintiff, Tom James Company ("Tom James"),
hereby moves this Court for an extension of time in which to file a reply to the
defendant’s, J. Tracy Green ("Defendant"), Memorandum of Law in Opposition of
Motion to Dismiss, dated December 15, 2003 ("Opposition Memorandum"), often (10)
days, as computed by Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, up to and
including January 14,.2004.
As good cause for the requested extension oftime, Tom James submits that,
despite its diligence in preparing a reply to Defendants Opposition Memorandum, the
additional time is necessary to respond fully and properly to the issues set forth therein.
l 1 ._ ¥`°T°l.l _
Tom James needs the additional time l'8C|U9StGd~l6i5WO §EibétG and analyze its
position regarding the Opposition Memorandurrizpgopglygg USG Um
gi; ;*;>dWIgtS°lI1***° HALLORAN shane 0100) 522-0:03
um icc Fax 00 548-0000
1-[artf`ord,Cl` 00103 $17 SAGE LLIP J,,,,S(,,,_)26\05
I
i_, ,.oL.LL....

- ~ Case 3:03-cv-OO596—)JBA Document 45 Filed 12/£§)G003 Page 2 of 3 I
This is Tom James’ first motion for extension of time regarding this matter.
Counsel for Defendant has consented to the requested extension of time.
VVHEREFORE, the plaintiff, Tom James Company, respectfully requests that the
Court grant its Motion for Extension of Time, dated December 30, 2003, and extend the
deadline for filing a reply to Defendant’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition of Motion to
Dismiss, up to and including January 14, 2004.
Dated: December 30, 2003 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Hartford, Connecticut
THE PLAINTIFF
TOM JAMES COMPANY
I
E 2 Z l
By:
Thomas J. Finn
Federal Bar No.: ct 20929
Paula Cruz Cedlllo
Federal Bar No.: ct 23485
HALLORAN & SAGE LLP
One Goodwin Square
225 Asylum Street
Hartford, Connecticut 06103 {
(860) 522-6103 I
I
.. 2 ....
OM G¤¤<1wi¤ Squaw HALLORAN Pima (asu) 522-6102 I
225 As lum Street gx .
Harrrog/¤,c1`06l03 SZ SAGE LLP §ulr;i;$£)z5£>§006 I

. ·~ Case 3:03-cv-OO5?6DJBA Document 45 Filed 12/30/?OO3 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that on this 30th day of December, 2003, a copy of the foregoing
was either mailed, postage prepaid, or hand-delivered to:
Thomas A. Rouse, Esq. i
Peter S. Olson, Esq. f
Pullman & Comiey, LLC
850 Main Street
P.O. Box 7006
Bridgeport, Connecticut 06601-7006
Attorneys for Defendants
Paula Cruz Cedilio
400000
I
I
I
- 3 - I
?£`$f?§§£1€’¥“£r??3“r° HAMRAN E“°“§é§621§%%§é°3
Harrrmd, cr 06103 S; SAGE LLP N0?26]0-5 W
i____ ,..w .im -