Free Order on Motion to Continue - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

""""+**c*—*···—··;—·*·--~· -— i ,i."........_...._..I, ..
.. —I‘— ·I·——I··—-;···-e-~·——.
: -cv- - ocumen - I e - a e 0
REQE\§9a 03 00575 suc 0 112_ FI d 11/05/ 003 P Q 1 f1 I
. `- I - ' I
S l!‘ Q • • •
is _m,,,,.,..,.% Unl1m1ted Repos essions LLC I
E B THINK NO ONE CARES --- MISS COUPLE OF OIAN PAYMENTS I
1:: ·¤ 1 I I
O Z
U E P.O. Box 172 I5? Office Locations:
II, Cheshire, Connecticut 06704 Maine I
G 9 203-272-8666 New Hampshire
_QI ;I 203—272-8662 Fax Vermont
15 E debbie@unlimitedrepossessionscom Massachusetts I
E cn [email protected] I Cormecticut
I0 E1 www.tmlimitedrepossessions.com Rhode Island I
* . - N Y k I
E g I BW Of
c iz I · ·
cu I I
It-1 vi I I
GJ ID T '
·o UI I
fl} E
°° E United States District Court I
FU WU ·
U District of Connecticut I I
$.4 .
I5 é East Courtroom Civili 03:03CV576
450 Main Street Q
1—I I I
‘ Hartford Connecticut I I
GJ D ’ I I
JZ} Lil I I
JJ EI · · I
z Q Z I
e1 m November 3, 2003 1 I
Q 0 § I
I
"* .‘” This letter is in response to the court papers that e have received ` the matter of I
-I-J 1-I O
§ El 8 Maritza Vargas v. Unlimited Repossessions, LLC Since this case as tiles we,
w III Unlimited Repossession, LLC have been lead to b lieve by Source One Financial I
, Q Eg Corporation that this matter was being handled on our behalf. Rec tly they, Source One, _
Z5 I0 nl have gone through some upper management chan es. We last con cted Source One
§ 5 3 approximately a week and a half ago and were ad ised by there o er.that he was told by
PI U; g his attorney that the case was settled, He, the own1I:r of Source One thought that this was
.2 E "' . for Unlimited as well. It has become apparent tha this is not the c e. We, Unlimited
ifi S ii Repossessions, have been trying to locate an atto ey to handle o case on some type of I
Ig ·-· g I payment plan since we are not a large company. ere is no cash o hand to retain an I
*6 g 2 I Ig attorney and we have even tried contacting Conn ticut Legal Serv ces etc. I
O it-l ·
-¤ — I 2
;I EI ig I I At this point we are requesting an extension of ti e so that we ma continue to locate an
g g I· '¤ attomey. We believe that we are not at fault in thi matter because fthe following:
In (D :L . __
.CS t` I N · I
lg ii ii Ig We have an Authorization to Repossess {rom the Iinance company I '
8 I? ¤ in —¤ · . . . I . . I
G, ·g O I g We have a c§`gy of the title showing that there IS rilten by th1s tin ce company.
5 · I . 6%* § 5 I I
LB In . I, wg·_e coritaged by the tinance company and ttIid to go to the a dress immediately
A, g 3 —@%causgthe d§l@>r was there and repossess the ve! icle. I
H fd CU O PI I ",.T,`j}__;____ ` I
SI E E "·‘“’*"" V I
U 0 :1 ';”;'We h@ a hgfgiarmless from the tinance company. I
cu cu cv iteim at iii? . I
L'. .¤ .¤ Q; _ ···- :
It IJ ’~’ fe .< ’ I
....» I
-, . .-—.~-¤·.··‘J; ,¤—==¢r:—· V —;..,...- s t ..,. _;~e,V¤:5 -.£i·=4·;,".»a;,;,·.·..~·;.·· Y.,1 I-,1r.I ·;_·.-~;I-;;.:,~I.‘.-__; new->¤~>9q\ ¤. ;Z·p¢.>i·—.*1·=1-1:»~·¤‘··é¤·¤~·>······1»»L, z--3:¤v>»»;;¤I; ;·Ic-G;-‘,#.·‘.¢—\ -.·V`t_5 `A-»»:¢X·=i¤¤~».:.§§·?1 $4·e_·r.—i§;"·.F1y;K~,y}3»§·F··' *‘·‘ wh sI_;·,». V . . ¢.—=' ` ‘ ` ` " I Vi gi I
“ I
- ‘i‘i‘ _