Free USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

_ F fI I 5 *6 7 3 gg M
Case 3:03-cv—O0573-PCD Document 30 Fal
MAN DATE i P I I ¤·<¤¤¤·=-@¤¢»‘-@
- 03-cv-573 T
Dorsey. J. ·
United States Court of Appeals
mm-as _ .
SECOND CIRCUIT V . -
I I ` At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit, held at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United @¤‘@etasHb®;% U¢·¤i%
500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on the ggth day o I I I “?*"?€?“L%’·
thousand and six. ?n...-demi p
I E5 2 qt I 5
Present: ________,_ _ . l
5 · Hm. Jqsé A. cabmes, _ p §§"CLF’ ""e G2, 5 if -
‘ Hon. Rosemary S. Pooler, In
Hon. Richard C. Wesley, Biggs Scam; 6.:1 p _
i . Circuit Judges. ,.39 F E L? I? I *·‘f.g·!,_ .
Q S AUG 2 9 2096 *;,`
= Levem Grant, I I ais-., _, _ tw III I
. . - e
p _ I 'Petitioner—Appel1ant, I * ` ` _
I v. ‘ I 06-1425-pr
I Commissioner Armstrong, p ‘ I
_ Respondent-Appellee. - _ _ I ·

Appellant, pro se, moves for a certificate ofappealability to appeal tiom a May 2004 judgment of I
the district court dismissing his habeas petition as time-barred and declining to issue a certificate -
of appealability. This Court has determined sua sperm: that the notice of appeal was untimely
. filed, and. thus, the appeal is DISMISSED. See Fed, R. App. P. 4(a)(I}. This Court may not _ _
extend the time for appellant to file a notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 26(b)(l). It is further
. ORDERED that the motion for a certificate of appealability is DENIED as moor.
POR THE COURT:
Roseann Z MacKechnie2ilerk
I I I =·= »I l ..-— .,
I . P CLIIIIIIII .
_ Lit, -·-,.,
I AUGI -2" 9 2006 ·III!°“*!I;III IMI II IN II_i“II_II_II IIII-InIII‘_I I I I II II
p 5 . ills 2 9 ms ~ » l

D ` _ I ||| ‘5) Eli;
Case 3:03-cv—00573-PCD Document 30 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 2 ot 4
D. Conn. im" W
03-cv-573 FL; 3
Dorsey, I.
United States Court of Appeals
Fon me .
SECOND CIRCUIT
· At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the
Second C1rcu1t, held at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse,
500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on the 29t:h day of August, two
thousand and six.
l Present:
Hon. José A. Cabranes,
Hon. Rosemary S. Pooler, `
Hon. Richard C. Wesley, __
Circuit Judges. 4%}* 'Ar ii ii *i·*i`i"*`“`?;i:,
§ Levern Grant,
Petitioner—Appellant, _ ` i" " ' ,,:_ p
v. 06— 1425-pr
Commissioner Armstrong, —# =-‘
Respondent-Appellee. as
_ 5 J
Appellant, pro se, moves for a certificate of appealability to appeal from a May 2004 judgment of
the district court dismissing his habeas petition as time-barred and declining to issue it certificate
of appealability. This Court has determined sua sponte that the notice of appeal was untimely
filed, and, thus, the appeal is DISMISSED. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(l). This Court may not
extend the time for appellant to file a notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 26(b)(l). It is further
ORDERED that the motion for a certificate of appealability is DENIED as moot.
FOR THE COURT:
Roseann ; MacKechnie lerk
Q .. I a 4 4
$5;%;:; SI1 LV W ' ·~ ‘
- _ E! up I fw { V//\
sA0:Ji= E::'i‘?r*· " 5
Certified:

I III 1 I H I
Case 3:03-cv—00573-PCD Document 30 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 3 of 4
A ._ "Frank Perez" To
fi.- E- ’¤ . ‘‘_ gov> CC
G 08/29/2006 02:14 PM b°°
Subject 06-1425 -pr Grant v. Armstrong Certified copy issued on
08/2.9196
‘;'—--·-·-·§» _,

Case 3:03-ov—00573-PCD Document 30 Filed 08/29/2006--
ll * ‘ D. Conn. ` n
S · 03-cv-573 ‘
l A _ _ Dorsey, I. ·- .
` United States Court of Appeals
mm _ _
o SECOND CIRCUIT
· at a stated Term of the United States Cotut of Appeals for the
· Second Ctr h ld h ' ‘ ‘ ·
cunt. e att le Dame] Patrick Moynthan United States Courthouse, .
; 500 Pearl Street, m the City of New York, on the gg;}. day of Augusg, two
thousand and stx. _
Present: V - -
Hon. José A. Cabranes, A
. Hon. Rosemary S. Pooler, "
Hon. Richard C. Wesley, . . gms umm; GF · V .
· Circuit Judges. Qi? F **-59
§ Aut; 2 9 zuns <;,
l Levern Grant, ***4,, 5 av- · I
"*¤%¤*`t·$§E}¥l%?‘ l
‘ 'Petitioner—Appel1aut, _, ` .
_ v. 06—1425—pr
i l Commissioner Armstrong, ‘
n i Respondent—Appellee. ‘
Appellant, pro se, moves for a certihcate of appealability to appeal-hom a May 2004 judgment of ‘ - `
the district court dismissing his habeas petition as time-barred and declining to issue a certificate _
ofappealability. This Court has determined sua spcnte that the notice of appeal was untimely o
tiled, and, thus, the appeal is DISMISSED. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). This Court may not
extend the time for appelkmt to file a notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 26{b)(1). It is further
_ ORDERED that the motion fer a certificate of appealability is DENIED as moot.
n l FOR THE COURT:
Roseann MaeKechnie Ierk ` . ‘
' Q -. - -1.. ·C 1 A lj
I R .4 ` ” we ¤zR•1‘I¥‘IBD ( t GRDPER 4 i sm t,.
. ` — ‘ C in STATm·tEN‘I‘ DF COSTS Q ‘?- ·
_ C mm _ n gsm! RECEIVED BY, __,,,.,,,.,‘ R .., ...,...........- ` l
. _ · .__ exim e" ` t
AUG292{lU6» ‘ ~ I an ` `