Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

ase 3:03-cv-00566-CFD Document 27 Filed 04/13/2004 Paget of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
PETER GIRARD, CASE NO.: 3:03CV0566(CFD)
Plaintiff,
THE ARROW LINE, INC./COACH
USA, :
Defendant. APRIL 13,2004
I DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN
WHICH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTlFF’S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
The defendant, The Arrow Line, Inc./Coach USA, respectfully requests from the
Court an extension of time of 8 days, until April 30, 2004, in which to respond to
plaintiffs Motion to Amend Complaint in the above—captioned case. The response was
originally due on April 22, 2004.
Defendant requests this extension for the reason that although this Motion to
Amend Complaint was filed on or about March 31, 2004 defendant’s counsel did not
receive a copy until April 8, 2004. ln addition, defendant’s counsel has an extensive
legal brief due on April 23'd in a different, pending client matter.
Plaintiffs counsel has been contacted and he has no objection to this request for
additional time.
This is the second request for an extension of time in connection with this matter.
ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

ase 3:03-cv-00566-CFD Document 27 Filed 04/13/2004 Page 2 of 2
DEFENDANT,
THE ARROW LINE, INC.lCOACH USA
By: Siegel, O’Connor, Zangari,
O’Donne|| & Beck, P.C.
Its Attorneys
150 Trumbull Street
Hartford, Connecticut 06103
(860) 7 7-8900
By:
Peter A. Janus
Federal Bar No. 6309
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this 13"‘ day of April, 2004, a copy of the foregoing Motion
to Amend Complaint was mailed, first class mail, postage pre—paid to:
Owen P. Eagan, Esq.
EAGAN & DONOHUE
24 Arapahoe Road
West Hartford, CT 06107
Peter A. Janus E §
2