Free Probation Form 12 - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Fm 12 Case 3:03—cr—00224-PCD Document 106 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
U.S.A. vs. CARLOS DELGADO Docket No. 3;03CR00224(PCD)
AMENDED PETITION ON PROBATION AND SUPERVISED RELEASE- I
COMES NOW, Michael E. Sheehan, PROBATION OFFICER OF THE COURT, presenting an official report upon the
conduct and attitude of Carlos Delgado who was sentenced to 37 months‘ imprisonmenbrfollowed by 3`·yearsl·sii.`ipervised
release, for a violation of Trafficking in Unauthorized and Counterfeit Access Devices, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2),
by the Honorable Peter C. Dorsey, Senior United States District Judge, sitting in the court in New Haven, Connecticut on
ll/lay 7, 2004, and imposed the general terms and conditions theretofore adopted by the Court and also imposed the following
special conditions: 1) The defendant shall obtain a psychiatric and/or psychological evaluation and/or in—patient/out—patient
counseling as approved by the U.S. Probation Office (USPO); 2) The defendant shall obtain substance abuse treatment and/or
in-patient/out-patientcounseling as approved by USPO; 3) The defendant shall pay some or all ofthe costs of substance abuse
and/or mental health treatment as deemed necessary and as approved by USPO on a pro rated basis; 4) The defendant shall
submit to random urine testing St monitoring as approved by USPO; 5) The defendant shall perform community senrice for a
period of 4 hours per week for one year for a total of 200 hours; 6) The defendant shall have no involvement nor relationship
with nor be in the presence of any person who uses, deals with, or distributes drugs, nor shall he be in the presence of any
actual usage of, dealing in or distribution of drugs of any nature; and 7) The defendant shall obtain no credit cards, credit
utilization or any financial dealings without prior approval of USPO.
On June 2, 2006, the defendant began his term of supervised release with a scheduled termination date of June 1, 2009.
RESPECTFULLY PRESENTING PETITION FOR ACTION OF COURT AND FOR CAUSE AS FOLLOWS:
Charge No. 1 - Mandatogg Condition: "While on supervised release, the defendant shall not commit another federal state
or local crime. The defendant shall not illegally possess a controlled substance?
On l\/lay 23, 2007, I\/lr. Delgado was arrested by the Windham, Connecticut Police Department and charged with Forgery 2°°
degree, Possession of Hallucinogen/l\/larijuana, and Larceny 3'° degree. l\/Ir. Delgado was held on a $100,000 bond and is
scheduled to appear in Danielson Superior Court on August 14, 2007.
On l\/lay 23, lvlr. Delgado arrested on a warrant by the Windham, Connecticut Police Department and charged with Larceny
2"" degree. The offense involved an incidentwhich occurred on February 23, 2007. Bond was set at $10,000 and Ii/Ir. Delgado
is scheduled to appear in Danielson Superior Court on August 14, 2007.
On l\/lay 24,2007, l\/lr. Delgado was arrested on a warrant by the Connecticut State Police, Troop D, charging him with Burglary
3'° degree and Larceny 3'° degree. The warrant stems from an incident involving the theft of a television from the Back Door
Cafe in Preston, Connecticut. The offense occurred on January 1, 2007. lVlr. Delgado was held on a $10,000 bond and is
scheduled to appear in Danielson Superior Court on August 14, 2007.
Charge No. 2 - Mandatory Condition: "You shall refrain from any unlawful use ofa controlled substance. You shall submit
to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment or placement on probation and at least two periodic drug tests
thereafter, as directed by the probation officer." l\/Ir. Delgado tested positive for marijuana on February 27, 2007.
Charge No. 3 - Standard Condition: "You shall answer truthfully all inguiries by the probation officer and follow the
instructions ofthe probation officer? Mr. Delgado initially denied all use of illegal substances when questioned by the Probation
Office, however, he later recanted his statements and admitted that he smoked marijuana two months prior to his February
test. in addition, he was instructed to report on March 8, 2007, so another sample could be taken and sentto the lab for further
analysis. He failed to report on that date and when contacted via telephone, I1/Ir. Delgado refused to respond to questioning
by the probation officer.
PRAYING THAT THE COURT WILL ORDER that this petition will senie as a warrant with the period of supervision
tolled, and bringing the defendant before the Court to show cause why his supenrision should not be revoked.

Case 3:03—cr—00224-PCD Document 106 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 2 of 2
ORDER OF COURT Sworn to By
Considered and ordered this Eel day of July 2007, and
ordered filed and made a part of the recrhrds in the above Michael E. Sheehan
case. · ll — - — fl Supervising United States Probation Officer
_ _ Place
The Honorable lfred V. Covello Q}
Senior United tates District Judge Date
Before me, the Honorable Alfred V. Covello, Senior United States District Judge, on this Q»71Qday of July 2007, at Hartford,
Connecticut, Supervising U.S. Probation Officer Michael E. Sheehan appeared and under oath stated that the facts set forth
in this petition are true to the best of his knowledge and belief. · · - .. t ll
The Howorable Alfred V. Covello
Senior nited States District Judge