Free Order on Motion for Protective Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

l : '
l P O ( __
l ` L ' Case 3:03-cv-00316-JCH Document 82 Filed 02/12/2004 Page 1 0121*/gf Omeg-
l Eg
W UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
) ...*.....,.._........._ l?l$TBlQT.QE.Q9N.NE9TlCUT
` JOHN J. CHAPMAN,
l Plaintiff, Case No. 303 CV 316 JCH
1 - against-
l $5 E
W EXPERIAN i1vi=on1viATloN ssnvlcss, mc. 5;%;,;, S ,
) CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A., i`jfj2Â¥_,-if I ll
QI} "“ "*“l`Z ,
i Defendants. , jg: E") )
———- —· --—--— ·- --—-———--——--—--—--- -·- --——----— _ _l ‘ ' i
l i A E
( CHASE’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER 33
J § 1. Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
( § defendant Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, N.A. (“Chase") moves for a protective
i order quashing or putting over plaintiffs Renotice of Deposition, dated January
l \
l 16, 2004. An affirmation is submitted herewith.
I Dated East Meadow, New York
i \I January 23, 2004 _
l I §
\~ § SIMMONS, JANNACE & STAGG, L.L.P.
l
Q `By: i
homas E. Stagg g
TQ. (Juris N0. Ct 23429)
_ _ Attorneys for Defendant
\R QW _ Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. l
,-A.,} = _ The Financial Center
5 U- - 90 Merrick Avenue, Suite 102 (
:.~>’·* East Meadow, New York 11554 `
°"' *··’ (516) 357-8100 _
NOM-Protective Order i
YQ
ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED \
l
7 L; _ #7-V i §;kr_;r_;T_ 7 _ 7 - - 7“—T`}—;--;:5:;:
_ FP "*" ‘ if i"cc‘c;c·c··e-—· · · ~ -eee:-ee
_ ;J g Ls k ihi-ivnéi _ i _ i V __H?O_;r-Egg:
F ”‘ **3 ’ TFT "*ti‘cc·";;·n- - —F:»-ee;