Free Order on Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

-__-_--H--—_—·-`_`Wr 1
__ , _ Case 3:03-cv-({3,117-JCH Document 43 Filed 3/2004 Page 1 of 1 1
t, ‘ { eeeeee » I I 1
4’l“2> · T
R E IV E U 1
, _ A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F 1 L, E D 2
-· — I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
· Q" 7AfL V _
jgqjAN|2 AILUU
JOHN . DWIGHT, MARGO D. FORBES, ; ug []13TR1[;T
PATRICIA D. HALLENBECK and : Bf1l·E}GEP GRI L I
ELIZABETH D. RICHARDSON, : CASE NUMBER 303 CV Q-1-7-7 (
i 1
Plaintiffs : "
v. :
: January 8, 2004
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, Trustee of :
the Russell S. Dwight, Jr. Trust, and :
PATRICIA W. DWIGHT, : .
Q 1 1 Defendants :
Q S fiti
LU Q-
___j T Hyg INTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CROSS-MOTION
-·-—— E 1;; EQOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT EIGHT DAYS LATE AND
M-OPPGSITIQQEU O DEFENDANT JP MORGAN CHASE BANK’S MOTION TO STRIKE
$ an J
Plaintiffg, John K. Dwight, Margo D. Forbes, Patricia D. Hallenbeck and Elizabeth D.
`LF
.QRichardson ("P1aintiffs") by and through their attorneys, Gravel and Shea, move for permission
ii tile their Cross—Motion for Summary Judgment! Opposition ("Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion") to · 1
ji gefendant JP Morgan Chase Bank (the "Bank’s) Motion for Summary Judgment eight days late,
I End hereby oppose the Bank’s Motion to Strike. Q
. ‘ 1 a This case presents questions of how to construe a testamentary trust. The parties agree
. § I
A- D 1gat the matter should be resolved by summary judgment. Cross-motions are before the Court.
. 1
1§lthough there is no claim of prejudice occasioned by the tiling of the Plaintiffs’ Cross-motion
1 on December 15, 2003, the Bank would have this Court refuse to consider it. Such a result
1
GRAVE1. AND SHEA 1
Armrmsvs AT LAW
P. 0. Box 369
BURLINGTON, Vmmonr {
0s4o2-0369
__ if ir _ livin`- — V
DMT -—-- 44 . A- ._-._-_ L-
if __ __ V uw -