Free Motion to Reduce Sentence re Crack Cocaine Offense - 18:3582 - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 63.8 kB
Pages: 6
Date: March 6, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,111 Words, 6,869 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/21860/35-2.pdf

Download Motion to Reduce Sentence re Crack Cocaine Offense - 18:3582 - District Court of Connecticut ( 63.8 kB)


Preview Motion to Reduce Sentence re Crack Cocaine Offense - 18:3582 - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cr-00106-AVC

Document 35-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VS. RICKY ELLIS : : : NO. 3:03CR106 (AVC) MARCH 4, 2008

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES On January 20, 2004, Ricky Ellis was sentenced for Possession with Intent to Distribute Five Grams or More of Cocaine Base, to serve 84 months of imprisonment and 4 years of supervised release. The sentence was imposed under the sentencing guidelines with a base offense level computed under §2D1.1 of the guidelines for a crack cocaine quantity of 16 grams. That base offense level ­ under the guidelines in effect at the time ­ was 23. Combined with other guideline factors, it produced a guideline range of 84 to 105 months. This court reduced the defendant's range, based on extraordinary rehabilitation, to 84 to 105 months. The sentence imposed by the Court was 84 months, which was the low end of the range. Subsequent to Ricky Ellis' sentencing ­ on November 1, 2007 ­ an amendment to §2D1.1 of the guidelines took effect, which, generally, reduces base offense levels for most quantities of crack cocaine by two levels and, specifically, reduces the base offense level for the 16 gram quantity of crack cocaine in this case by two levels, to 24 and to level 21 if three points are deducted for acceptance of responsibility; See U.S.S.G. §2D1.1. This amendment was adopted in response to studies which raise grave doubts about the fairness and rationale of the 100-to-1 crack/powder ration

Case 3:03-cr-00106-AVC

Document 35-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 2 of 6

incorporated into the sentencing guidelines. See generally United States Sentencing Commission, Report to Congress: Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy (May 2007) (hereinafter "2007 Sentencing Commission Report"); United States Sentencing Commission, Report to Congress: Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy (May 2002); United States Sentencing Commission, Special Report to Congress: Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy (April 1997); United States Sentencing Commission, Special Report to Congress: Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy (Feb. 1995). See also Kimbrough v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 558, 568-69 (2007) (discussing history of crack cocaine guideline and various Sentencing Commission reports). Yet the amendment is only a partial response, as the Sentencing Commission itself recognized. The Commission explained: The Commission, however views the amendment only as a partial remedy to some of the problems associated with the 100-to-1 drug quantity ration. It is neither a permanent nor a complete solution to these problems. Any comprehensive solution requires appropriate legislative action by Congress. It is the Commission's firm desire that this report will facilitate prompt congressional action addressing the 100-to-1 drug quantity ratio. 1007 Sentencing Commission Report, supra at 10. Subsequent to the effective date of this amendment to §2D1.1, the Sentencing Commission considered whether to make the amendment retroactive under the authority created by 18 U. S. C. §3582(c)(2). It took that action on December 11,

Case 3:03-cr-00106-AVC

Document 35-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 3 of 6

2007, by including this amendment in the list of retroactive amendments in §1B1.10 of the guidelines. See 73 Fed. Reg. 217-01(2008). Based on this retroactivity, the statutory authority underlying it, and the Supreme Court's intervening decisions in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005); Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456 (2007); Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586 (2007); and Kimbrough v. United States, supra, Ricky Ellis brings this motion to reduce his sentencing. II. ARGUMENT A. RICKY ELLIS' OFFENSE LEVEL SHOULD BE REDUCED FROM 92 TO 145

MONTHS, AND THE GUIDELINE RANGE REDUCED FROM 84 TO 105 MONTHS BASED ON THE AMENDMENT TO §2D1.1. 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2) provides as follows: [I]n the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(o), upon motion of the defendant...the court may reduce the term of imprisonment, after considering the factors set forth in section 3553(a) to the extent that they are applicable, if such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission. Section 1B1.10 is the guidelines policy statement which implements 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2). Subsection (c) of that policy statement lists amendments that are

Case 3:03-cr-00106-AVC

Document 35-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 4 of 6

covered by the policy statement. And one of the amendments which is listed is amendment 711 to the guidelines.1 That is the amendment which reduced the base offense level for crack cocaine offenses. See U.S.S.G., App. C, §711. Application of this amendment to the crack cocaine guideline in the present case results in a decrease of the base offense level from 120 to 150 months, a decrease in the total offense level from 92 to 115 months, and a decrease in the resulting guideline range from 84 to 105 months. The defendant's original range was set by CHC VI; Base offense level 26; §2D1.1 before amendments. That range was reduced by 3 points to guideline range 23 for acceptance of responsibility and, thus, a range of 92-115 months. The court departed down one level for extraordinary rehabilitation to Level 22 and a range of 84 to 105 months. B. THE COURT SHOULD REDUCE RICKY ELLIS' SENTENCE TO 70 MONTHS. Based on the amendment to §2D1.1, the Court should significantly reduce Ricky Ellis' sentence. It follows from the discussion in the preceding section that the amendment alone justifies a reduction of 14 months. III. CONCLUSION The Court should adjust Ricky Ellis' sentencing guideline range downward to 70 to 87 months. It should then impose a sentence of 70 months.

This am endm ent is not listed in the Novem ber 1, 2007, Guidelines Manual because the Sentencing Com m ission vote m aking it retroactive was on Decem ber 11, 2007. See United States Sentencing Com m ission News Release dated Decem ber 11, 2007, available at http://www.USSG.gov/Press/rel121107.htm . See also 73 Fed. Reg. 217-01 (2008).

1

Case 3:03-cr-00106-AVC

Document 35-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 5 of 6

Respectfully submitted, DEFENDANT, RICKY ELLIS

By:__________________________________ Richard S. Cramer 250 Hudson Street Hartford, CT 06106 Tel. (860) 560-7704 Federal Bar No. ct00016 Email: [email protected]

Case 3:03-cr-00106-AVC

Document 35-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 6 of 6

CERTIFICATION THIS IS TO CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing was mailed this 4th day of March 2008 to:

Raymond F. Miller Assistant U. S. Attorney 157 Church Street New Haven, CT 06510

_____________________________ Richard S. Cramer