Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 63.1 kB
Pages: 3
Date: March 29, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 490 Words, 3,002 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/15485/73.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 63.1 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:01-cv-02296-RNC

Document 73

Filed 03/29/2004

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : : : : VS. : : MELVIN WEARING, BRIAN SULLIVAN, : THOMAS TROCCHIO, EDWARD KENDALL, : ESTATE OF ANTHONY DILULLO, by Lisa : Bull DiLullo, Legal Representative,: JOHN DOES, RICHARD LEVIN, : LINDA LORIMER, RICHARD BRODHEAD, : THOMAS CONROY, and JAMES PERROTTI, : Defendants. : JAMES VAN DE VELDE, Plaintiff,

CIVIL NO. 3:01cv02296(RNC)

MARCH 29, 2004

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Plaintiff James Van De Velde hereby moves for an extension of time to April 1, 2004 to file a motion, pursuant to Local Rule 7(c), for reconsideration of the Court's ruling filed March 15, 2004 granting the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Richard Levin, Linda Lorimer, Richard Brodhead, Thomas Conroy, and James Perrotti, and the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by defendants Melvin Wearing, Brian Sullivan, Thomas Trocchio, Edward Kendall, and Estate of Anthony DiLullo. plaintiff states as follows: The current deadline for filing a motion for reconsideration under Local Rule 7(c) is March 29, 2004. Counsel for plaintiff plan to file such a motion, and have made substantial progress on the motion and supporting memorandum. In support thereof,

Case 3:01-cv-02296-RNC

Document 73

Filed 03/29/2004

Page 2 of 3

A brief additional extension of time is required in order to finalize the motion for reconsideration. As the Court is aware,

the initial motions involved numerous substantial legal issues, which were addressed in lengthy briefs filed by the parties. For these reasons, plaintiff requests an extension of time to April 1, 2004 for the filing of his motion for reconsideration. William J. Doyle, Esq., counsel for the Yale defendants, does not object to the requested extension. Counsel was unable to reach

Robert A. Rhoades, Esq., counsel for the New Haven defendants, to ascertain his position. No prior motions for extension have been

filed with respect to this deadline. THE PLAINTIFF JAMES VAN DE VELDE By____________________________________ David T. Grudberg, ct01186 JACOBS, GRUDBERG, BELT & DOW, P.C. 350 Orange St. P.O. Box 606 New Haven, CT 06503 Ph.:(203) 772-3100 Fax:(203) 772-1691 Email: [email protected] James I. Meyerson, ct24660 396 Broadway - Suite 601 New York, New York 10013 Ph.:(212) 226-3310 Fax: (212) 219-9412 Email: [email protected] His Attorneys

2

Case 3:01-cv-02296-RNC

Document 73

Filed 03/29/2004

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed first class, postage prepaid on March 29, 2004 to: Martin S. Echter, Esq. Deputy Corporation Counsel 165 Church St. - 4th Fl. New Haven, CT 06510 Stephen P. Fogerty, Esq. Robert A. Rhodes, Esq. Halloran & Sage LLP 315 Post Road West Westport, CT 06880 William J. Doyle, Esq. Kenneth D. Heath, Esq. Wiggin & Dana One Century Tower New Haven, CT 06510

_____________________________ David T. Grudberg

3