Free Motion for Default Judgment - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 40.3 kB
Pages: 5
Date: February 8, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 978 Words, 6,133 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/4389/28-1.pdf

Download Motion for Default Judgment - District Court of Federal Claims ( 40.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Default Judgment - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:87-cv-00435-EGB

Document 28

Filed 02/08/2007

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

GATEWAY LUMBER CO., et al. (Gateway Lumber Co.), Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Consolidated under lead case No. 87-435C (No. 87-435C) (Judge Bruggink)

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS TO QUANTUM IN GATEWAY LUMBER CO. v. UNITED STATES, NO. 87-435C Pursuant to Rule 55(b) and this Court's January 9, 2007 Order, we respectfully request that the Court enter a default judgment against Gateway Lumber Company ("Gateway") and in favor of the United States on its counterclaim in the amount of $916,412.61, plus interest calculated pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act ("CDA"), 41 U.S.C. § 611.1 In support of this motion, we rely upon the pleadings, this Court's April 11, 2006 Order which entered a default against Gateway pursuant to Rule 55(a), the attached Declaration of Christine Anderson, and the documents reproduced in our attached appendix. Rule 55(b) provides for the entry of a default judgment, where, as here, Gateway has failed to defend itself and the Government "establishes a claim or right to relief by evidence satisfactory to the court." Id. As a result of Gateway's earlier failure to respond to our motion for partial summary judgment as to liability, this Court, in its April 11, 2006 Order, concluded
1

The United States is entitled, as a matter of law, to prejudgment interest calculated pursuant to the CDA from January 1, 1994. Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United States, 48 Fed. Cl. 814, 836-37 (2001), aff'd 308 F.3d 1283 (Fed. Cir. 2002). -1-

Case 1:87-cv-00435-EGB

Document 28

Filed 02/08/2007

Page 2 of 5

that "liability is established" and directed the clerk "to enter default in favor of the [United States] on its counterclaim. See Order of April 11, 2006. Gateway's Eldred Creek Timber Sale Contract, which is the subject of this case, contained Standard Provision B9.4, which provides the formula for determining the damages, if any, due the United States in the event of a purchaser's default. Standard Provision B9.4 provides in pertinent part: B9.4 Failure to Cut. In the event of (a) termination for breach or (b) Purchaser's failure to cut designated timber on portions of the Sale Area by Termination date, Forest Service shall appraise remaining Included Timber, unless termination is under B8.22. Such appraisal shall be made with the standard Forest Service method in use at time of termination. Damages due the United States for Purchaser's failure to cut and remove such timber meeting Utilization Standards shall be the amount by which the Current Contract Value[,] plus the cost of resale, less any effective Purchaser Credits remaining at time of termination, exceeds the resale value at new Bid Rates. If there is no resale, damages due shall be determined by subtracting from the value established by said appraisal from the difference between Current Contract Value and Effective Purchaser Credit. See D. App. 1 (Standard Provision B9.4). After Gateway's default, the Forest Service chose not to resell the remaining timber included in the Sale. Anderson Decl. ¶ 2.2 The Federal Circuit has repeatedly held that the United States is entitled to damages calculated in the manner prescribed by Standard Provision B9.4 where, as here, the Forest Service chooses not to resell the remaining, uncut timber included in a defaulted sale. Hoskins Lumber Co. v. United States, 89 F.3d 816, 817 (Fed. Cir. 1996);

"Anderson Decl. ¶ of Christine Anderson.

2

" refers to the cited paragraph(s) in the accompanying Declaration -2-

Case 1:87-cv-00435-EGB

Document 28

Filed 02/08/2007

Page 3 of 5

Madigan v. Hobin Lumber Co., 986 F.2d 1401, 1405 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Further, the Federal Circuit has made clear that "the only question" for the trial court in a case such as this is "whether the government complied with its standard appraisal method" in determining the value of the remaining timber at the time of contract termination. Hoskins Lumber, 89 F.3d at 817 (emphasis in original). As demonstrated in her Declaration, Ms. Anderson has determined the damages due the United States as a result of Gateway's default using the standard Forest Service appraisal method in use at the time of contract termination (August 1985). See Anderson Decl. ¶¶ 1-8. We incorporate here, by reference, Ms. Anderson's Declaration which sets forth the amount of the damages due the United States ($916,412.61) and demonstrates the manner in which they were determined (i.e., using the then-standard Forest Service appraisal method). Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the United States respectfully requests that the Court enter a default judgment against Gateway and in favor of the United States on its counterclaim in the amount of $916,412.61, plus interest pursuant to the CDA from January 1, 1994. Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General J. CHRISTOPHER KOHN Director JOHN W. SHOWALTER Assistant Director

-3-

Case 1:87-cv-00435-EGB

Document 28

Filed 02/08/2007

Page 4 of 5

s/Richard P. Nockett RICHARD P. NOCKETT Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 1100 L Street, N.W. (8th Floor) Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: (202) 307-1134 Fax: (202) 307-0494 Attorneys for Defendant Dated: February 8, 2007

-4-

Case 1:87-cv-00435-EGB

Document 28

Filed 02/08/2007

Page 5 of 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that on this 9th day of Feburary 2007,

I caused copies of the foregoing "DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS TO QUANTUM IN GATEWAY LUMBER CO. v. UNITED STATES, No. 87-435C," and the accompanying "DECLARATION OF CHRISTINE ANDERSON", and the "APPENDIX TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS TO QUANTUM" to be served upon the following individual by United States mail (first-class, postage prepaid) and also by facsimile transmission.

DENNIS J. DUNPHY, Esq. Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt 1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3010 Seattle, Washington 98101-2393

s/Richard P. Nockett

-5-