Free Stipulation - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 80.9 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 518 Words, 3,590 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/9344/257.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of Delaware ( 80.9 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:05-cv-00027-SLR

Document 257

Filed 08/10/2006

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
GUARDIAN INDUSTRIES CORP., Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) )

Case No.: 05-27-SLR Jury Trial Demanded

DELL, INC.; GATEWAY, INC.; HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY; ACER INC.; ACER AMERICA CORPORATION; AOC INTERNATIONAL; ENVISION PERIPHERALS, INC.; TPV TECHNOLOGY, LTD.; TPV INTERNATIONAL (USA), INC.; TATUNG COMPANY; TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC.; COMPAL ELECTRONICS, INC.; LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION: LITE-ON, INC. a/k/a LITEON TRADING USA, INC.; MAG TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, LTD.; MAG TECHNOLOGY USA, INC.; PROVIEW INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LTD.; PROVIEW TECHNOLOGY, INC.; and PROVIEW ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD., Defendants. STIPULATED DISMISSAL

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

WHEREAS, plaintiff, Guardian Industries Corp., alleged that defendants Envision Peripherals, Inc., TPV Technology, Ltd., and TPV International (USA), Inc. have infringed United States Patents Nos. 5,570,214, 5,694,187, 6,226,065 and 6,229,588; WHEREAS, Envision Peripherals, Inc., TPV Technology, Ltd., and TPV International (USA), Inc. have provided a Written Confirmation that they do not have unlicensed LCD module suppliers; WHEREAS, Envision Peripherals, Inc., TPV Technology, Ltd., and TPV International (USA), Inc. have provided a Written Confirmation that they do not sell any

Case 1:05-cv-00027-SLR

Document 257

Filed 08/10/2006

Page 2 of 3

LCD products that incorporate unlicensed LCD modules containing Fuji Wide View Film; and WHEREAS, plaintiff Guardian Industries Corp. and defendants Envision Peripherals, Inc., TPV Technology, Ltd., and TPV International (USA), Inc., as indicated by the signature of counsel appearing below, have agreed to the dismissal of Envision Peripherals, Inc., TPV Technology, Ltd., and TPV International (USA), Inc. from this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and subject to the terms of this Order, NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows: 1. In view of the representations made by Envision Peripherals, Inc., TPV Technology, Ltd., and TPV International (USA), Inc. in the Written Confirmation, the claims by Guardian Industries Corp. against Envision Peripherals, Inc., TPV Technology, Ltd., and TPV International (USA), Inc. are hereby dismissed without prejudice with respect to Envision Peripherals, Inc., TPV Technology, Ltd., and TPV International (USA), Inc.

-2-

Case 1:05-cv-00027-SLR

Document 257

Filed 08/10/2006

Page 3 of 3

2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys fees attributable to the prosecution and defense of the claims against Envision Peripherals, Inc., TPV Technology, Ltd., and TPV International (USA), Inc. Dated: August 10, 2006

/s/ Richard K. Herrmann Richard K. Herrmann MORRIS JAMES HITCHENS & WILLIAMS 222 Delaware Avenue, 10th Floor Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (302) 888-6800 [email protected] Bryan S. Hales Craig D. Leavell Meredith Zinanni KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 200 East Randolph Drive Chicago, Illinois 60601 (312)861-2000 Counsel for Guardian Industries Corp.

/s/ Matthew W. King Robert W. Whetzel Matthew W. King RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER P.A. One Rodney Square, 920 North King Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (302) 651-7700 [email protected] Elaine Y. Chow, Esq. PRESTON, GATES & ELLIS LLP 55 Second Street, Suite 1700 San Francisco, California 94105-3493 (415) 882-8200 Counsel for Envision Peripherals, Inc., TPV Technology, Ltd., and TPV International (USA), Inc.

SO ORDERED this _____ day of ______________________, 2006. Judge Sue L. Robinson

-3-