Case 1:04-cv-01470-LJB
Document 18
Filed 07/29/2005
Page 1 of 9
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS HEUBECK SPRINKLER INSPECTION COMPANY, INC. Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. 04-1470c (Judge Bush)
DEFENDANT'S AMENDED ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES For its answer to the amended complaint, defendant, the United States, admits, denies, and alleges as follows: 1. The allegations contained in paragraph 1 constitute
legal conclusions to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 2. The allegations contained in paragraph 2 constitute
legal conclusions to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 3. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 3 for
lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 4. 5. Admits. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 5 to the
extent supported by the document cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies. 6. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 6 to the
extent supported by the document cited, which is the best evidence of the contents; otherwise denies.
Case 1:04-cv-01470-LJB
Document 18
Filed 07/29/2005
Page 2 of 9
7.
Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 7 to the
extent supported by the document cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies. 8. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 8 to the
extent supported by the document to which it refers, which is the best evidence of the contents; otherwise denies. 9. Denies the allegations contained in the first clause of Admits the allegations
the first sentence of paragraph 9.
contained in the second clause of the first sentence of paragraph 9. Admits the allegations contained in the second sentence of
paragraph 9 to the extent supported by the text of the document to which it refers, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies. 10. Admits the allegations contained in the first sentence
of paragraph 10 only to the extent supported by the contract, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies. Denies the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 10. Admits the allegations contained in the third Admits that HSIC submitted a proposal;
sentence of paragraph 10.
denies the remainder of the fourth sentence of paragraph 10 as to what Plaintiff "rel[ied] upon" for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 11. Admits the allegations contained in clause (a) of the
first sentence of paragraph 11 only to the extent supported by
2
Case 1:04-cv-01470-LJB
Document 18
Filed 07/29/2005
Page 3 of 9
the text of the document to which it refers, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies; denies the remainder of the first sentence of paragraph 11. Denies the allegations
contained in the second sentence of paragraph 11 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 12. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 12 only
to the extent supported by the modification of the contract, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies. 13. Admits that HSIC was assigned three task orders; otherwise denies allegations contained in paragraph 13. 14. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 14 to
the extent supported by the text of the document to which it refers, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies. 15. The allegations contained in paragraph 15 constitute
conclusions of law to which no answer is required; to the extent they are deemed allegations of fact, they are denied for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 16. Admits the allegations in paragraph 16 only to the
extent supported by the text of the document to which it refers, which is the best evidence of its contents, and otherwise denies. 17. Admits.
3
Case 1:04-cv-01470-LJB
Document 18
Filed 07/29/2005
Page 4 of 9
18. 19. 20.
Admits. Repeats and realleges the responses to paragraphs 1-18. Admits the allegations of paragraph 20 only to the
extent supported by the text of the document to which it refers, which document is the best evidence of its contents. 21. The allegation contained in paragraph 21 is a
conclusion of law to which no answer is required. 22. The allegations contained in the first sentence of
paragraph 21 constitute conclusions of law to which no answer is required; to the extent they are deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. The remainder of paragraph 22 constitutes the
Plaintiff's prayer for relief and does not require a responsive pleading. 23. 22. 24. 25. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 24. The allegations contained in paragraph 25 constitute Repeats and realleges the responses to paragraphs 1-
conclusions of law to which no answer is required. 26. The allegations contained in paragraph 26 constitute
conclusions of law to which no answer is required. 27. The allegations contained in paragraph 27 constitute
conclusions of law to which no answer is required. 28. Repeats and realleges the responses to paragraphs 1-27.
4
Case 1:04-cv-01470-LJB
Document 18
Filed 07/29/2005
Page 5 of 9
29.
The allegations contained in paragraph 29 constitute
conclusions of law to which no answer is required. 30. The allegations contained in paragraph 30 constitute conclusions of law to which no answer is required. 31. Denies. 32. Denies. 33. Admits the allegations of paragraph 33 only to the extent supported by the text of the documents to which it refers, which document is the best evidence of its contents. 34. The allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 34 constitute conclusions of law to which no answer is required; to the extent they are deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. The remainder of paragraph 34 constitutes the
Plaintiff's prayer for relief and does not require a responsive pleading. 35. Repeats and realleges the responses to paragraphs 1-34. 36. Admits the allegations contained in the first clause of the first sentence of paragraph 36; admits the allegations of the second clause only to the extent supported by the text of the document to which it refers, which document is the best evidence of its contents. 37. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 37 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth.
5
Case 1:04-cv-01470-LJB
Document 18
Filed 07/29/2005
Page 6 of 9
38. Denies. 39. Denies the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 39 as to the basis for HSIC submitting a bid for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to its truth; the remainder of the second sentence of paragraph 39 constitutes a conclusion of law to which no response is required. The remainder of paragraph 39 constitutes the
Plaintiff's prayer for relief and does not require a responsive pleading. 40. Repeats and realleges the responses to paragraphs 1-39. 41. The allegations contained in paragraph 41 constitute conclusions of law to which no answer is required. 42. The allegations contained in paragraph 42 constitute conclusions of law to which no answer is required; to the extent they are deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 43. The allegations contained in paragraph 42 constitute conclusions of law to which no answer is required; to the extent they are deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 44. The allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 44 constitute conclusions of law to which no answer is required; to the extent they are deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. The remainder of paragraph 44 constitutes the
Plaintiff's prayer for relief and does not require a responsive pleading.
6
Case 1:04-cv-01470-LJB
Document 18
Filed 07/29/2005
Page 7 of 9
45. Repeats and realleges the responses to paragraphs 1-44. 46. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 46 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 47. The allegations contained in paragraph 47 constitute legal conclusions to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 48. The allegations contained in paragraph 48 constitute conclusions of law to which no response is required. 49. Denies that plaintiff is entitled to the relief set forth in the prayer for relief immediately following paragraph 48, or to any relief whatsoever. 50. Denies each and every allegation not previously
admitted or otherwise qualified.
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 51. Plaintiff's claims are barred in whole or in part by
accord and satisfaction. 52. Plaintiff's claims are barred in whole or in part by
the doctrine of estoppel.
WHEREFORE, defendant respectfully requests that the Court enter judgment for defendant, dismiss the complaint, and grant
7
Case 1:04-cv-01470-LJB
Document 18
Filed 07/29/2005
Page 8 of 9
defendant such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director S/Donald E. Kinner DONALD E. KINNER Assistant Director OF COUNSEL: STEPHEN L. SCHWARTZ Assistant Regional Counsel U.S. General Services Administration 301 Seventh St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20407 S/Tara K. Hogan TARA K. HOGAN Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 1100 L Street, N.W., 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: (202) 307-1011 Fax: (202) 514-7964 Attorneys for Defendant
July 29, 2005
8
Case 1:04-cv-01470-LJB
Document 18
Filed 07/29/2005
Page 9 of 9
CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on this 29th day of July, 2005 a copy of the foregoing "AMENDED ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing
will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. The parties may access this filing
through the Court's system. s/Tara K. Hogan
9