Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 16.2 kB
Pages: 4
Date: April 13, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 592 Words, 3,865 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/17005/52.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims ( 16.2 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:03-cv-02794-TCW

Document 52

Filed 04/13/2006

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ____________________________________ ) ACCEPTANCE INSURANCE ) COMPANIES INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 03-2794 v. ) (Judge Wheeler) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME Defendant, the United States, respectfully requests an enlargement of time of seven days, to and including May 1, 2006, within which to file and serve defendant's combined brief in opposition to plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment and reply in support of defendant's renewed motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, as well as an enlargement of seven days to file and serve defendant's responses to plaintiff's proposed findings of uncontroverted fact. Defendant's papers are currently due on April 24, 2006. This is our first request for an enlargement of time to file these papers. Plaintiff's counsel has stated that plaintiff does not oppose this request. The requested enlargement is necessary because the trial attorney who has held responsibility for this case is leaving the Department of Justice. Defendant requires the additional time so that the new trial attorney who is being assigned to the case can finalize defendant's papers, and agency counsel and supervisory lawyers at the Department of Justice can review and comment on them. The additional time will permit defendant to prepare thorough papers that will be of greatest assistance to the Court in resolving the pending motions. Before seeking plaintiff's consent to this request, defendant had already agreed not to

Case 1:03-cv-02794-TCW

Document 52

Filed 04/13/2006

Page 2 of 4

oppose plaintiff's request for an additional week to file its reply. Plaintiff's counsel has now informed defendant's counsel that if the Court grants defendant's request, plaintiff requests that it be allowed to file its reply brief on May 17, 2006 because of travel plans of plaintiff's counsel. Plaintiff's reply brief is currently due on May 8, 2006. For the foregoing reasons, we respectfully request that the Court grant our unopposed request for an enlargement of time of seven days, to and including May 1, 2006, to file and serve defendant's combined brief in opposition to plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment and reply in support of defendant's renewed motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, as well as an enlargement of seven days to file and serve defendant's responses to plaintiff's proposed findings of uncontroverted fact.

Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director

s/ Mark A. Melnick MARK A. MELNICK Assistant Director

2

Case 1:03-cv-02794-TCW

Document 52

Filed 04/13/2006

Page 3 of 4

OF COUNSEL: DONALD A. BRITTENHAM, JR. Attorney Community Development Division Office of the General Counsel U.S. Department of Agriculture 1400 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20250

s/ John H. Williamson JOHN H. WILLIAMSON Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice 1100 L St., N.W., 8th floor Washington, D.C. 20530 Tel: (202) 307-0277 Fax: (202) 307-0972 Attorneys for Defendant

April 13, 2006

3

Case 1:03-cv-02794-TCW

Document 52

Filed 04/13/2006

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify under penalty of perjury that on this 13th day of April, 2006, a copy of the foregoing "DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system.

s/ John H. Williamson